ArticleRevista espanola de sanidad penitenciaria
Patients' preferences for treatment with the new direct acting antiviral therapies for chronic hepatitis C virus infection.
Article in Revista espanola de sanidad penitenciaria. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An algorithm for simplified hepatitis C virus treatment with non-specialist care based on nation-wide data from Taiwan.Hepatology international · 2024Observational
- The effect of cognitive emotion regulation on direct-acting antivirals adherence in patients with hepatitis C.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe efficacy of new direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) in treating hepatitis C infection can depend on treatment adherence, which may be influenced by the patient's current lack of awareness of the disease. This study set out to understand the treatment naïve chronic hepatitis C patients' preferences for new DAAs (attributes) and to compile information about the diagnosis process. MATERIAL AND
methodSpanish quantitative market research study conducted between November 2018 and January 2019 to assess the posology preferences of treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C before starting treatment (seen by hepatologists and infectious diseases specialists). A telephone interview was carried out to collect demographic, diagnostic and treatment preference data, consisting of two dosing OPTIONS: 1) three tablets/day (single dose), at the same time, with food (8 weeks). 2) single tablet/day, at any time with/without food (12 weeks). A descriptive analysis of pooled results was performed.
results104 patients (mean age: 49 years) with hepatitis C diagnosed 7.3±9.7 years ago (average), mainly in primary care (PC) (42%). The most common reasons for not having started treatment were health problems/comorbidities (31%). Fifty-eight percent of patients were not informed about the available treatments. Seventy-two percent of patients preferred a simple tablet/day, at any time, with/without food (12 weeks), and considered compatibility with other treatments, side effects, ease of administration, treatment duration and the number of tablets to be very important. DISCUSSION: Patient preferences are mainly driven by dosing flexibility and simplicity, including freedom to take the medication with/without food. The role of PC in the diagnosis should be taken into account. There are still patients who are untreated after diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.