Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34279459›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

The Long-Term Effect of Treatment Using the Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation rTMS in Patients after Incomplete Cervical or Thoracic Spinal Cord Injury.

Agnieszka Wincek, Juliusz Huber, Katarzyna Leszczyńska, Wojciech Fortuna, Stefan Okurowski, Krzysztof Chmielak, Paweł Tabakow

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Bridging the gap: a translational perspective in spinal cord injury.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Agnieszka WincekDepartment of Pathophysiology of Locomotor Organs, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 28 Czerwca 1956 nr 135/147, 60-545 Poznań, Poland.
Juliusz HuberDepartment of Pathophysiology of Locomotor Organs, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 28 Czerwca 1956 nr 135/147, 60-545 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8671-0497
Katarzyna LeszczyńskaDepartment of Pathophysiology of Locomotor Organs, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 28 Czerwca 1956 nr 135/147, 60-545 Poznań, Poland.
Wojciech FortunaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska 213, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.
Stefan OkurowskiNeurorehabilitation Center for Treatment of Spinal Cord Injuries AKSON, ul. Bierutowska 23, 51-317 Wroclaw, Poland.
Krzysztof ChmielakDepartment of Neurosurgery, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska 213, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.
Paweł TabakowDepartment of Neurosurgery, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska 213, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · PLWroclaw Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) may support motor function recovery in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI). Its effectiveness mainly depends on the applied algorithm. This clinical and neurophysiological study aimed to assess the effectiveness of high-frequency rTMS in iSCI patients at the C2-Th12 levels. rTMS sessions (lasting 3-5 per month, from 2 to 11 months, 5 months on average) were applied to 26 iSCI subjects. The motor cortex was bilaterally stimulated with a frequency at 20-25 Hz and a stimulus strength that was 70-80% of the resting motor threshold (15.4-45.5% maximal output) during one therapeutic session. Surface electromyography (sEMG) recordings at rest and during maximal contractions and motor evoked potential (MEP) recordings were performed from the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and the tibialis anterior (TA) muscles. The same neurophysiological studies were also performed in patients treated with kinesiotherapy only (K group,

Indexed as

cervical and thoracic spinal cord injuryincomplete spinal cord injuryrehabilitationrepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID34279459
PMCPMC8268291
OpenAlexW3181536787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.