Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34279431›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Plasma and Polymers: Recent Progress and Trends.

Igor Levchenko, Shuyan Xu, Oleg Baranov, Olha Bazaka, Elena P Ivanova, Kateryna Bazaka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Spinel CoFeNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Igor LevchenkoPlasma Sources and Application Centre, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637616, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-8606-6195
Shuyan XuPlasma Sources and Application Centre, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637616, Singapore.
Oleg BaranovFaculty of Aircraft Engines, National Aerospace University, 61070 Kharkiv, Ukraine.ORCID 0000-0001-5356-1125
Olha BazakaSchool of Science, RMIT University, P.O. Box 2476, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia.
Elena P IvanovaSchool of Science, RMIT University, P.O. Box 2476, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia.
Kateryna BazakaPlasma Sources and Application Centre, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637616, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plasma-enhanced synthesis and modification of polymers is a field that continues to expand and become increasingly more sophisticated. The highly reactive processing environments afforded by the inherently dynamic nature of plasma media are often superior to ambient or thermal environments, offering substantial advantages over other processing methods. The fluxes of energy and matter toward the surface enable rapid and efficient processing, whereas the charged nature of plasma-generated particles provides a means for their control. The range of materials that can be treated by plasmas is incredibly broad, spanning pure polymers, polymer-metal, polymer-wood, polymer-nanocarbon composites, and others. In this review, we briefly outline some of the recent examples of the state-of-the-art in the plasma-based polymer treatment and functionalization techniques.

Indexed as

plasmapolymer functionalizationpolymers

Identifiers

PMID34279431
PMCPMC8271681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.