Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34279297›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Nano Calcium Carbonate (CaCO

Lochana Poudyal, Kushal Adhikari, Moon Won

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lochana PoudyalDepartment of Civil, Environmental & Construction Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.
Kushal AdhikariDepartment of Civil, Environmental & Construction Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.
Moon WonDepartment of Civil, Environmental & Construction Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fly ash is widely used in the cement industry to improve the performance and durability of concrete. The future availability of fly ash, however, is a concern, as most countries are inclining towards renewable energy sources as opposed to fossil fuels. Additional concerns have been raised regarding the impact of strict environmental regulations on fly ash quality and variability. This paper, therefore, evaluates if nano calcium carbonate (nano CaCO

Indexed as

environmental sustainabilitynanotechnology and nano CaCO3ordinary Portland cement (OPC)performance and durabilityPortland limestone cement (PLC)supplementary cementing materials (SCMs) and fly ashworkability and mechanical properties

Identifiers

PMID34279297
PMCPMC8269888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.