Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34279218›Full record

ArticleeLife2021

Niche partitioning facilitates coexistence of closely related honey bee gut bacteria.

Silvia Brochet, Andrew Quinn, Ruben A T Mars, Nicolas Neuschwander, Uwe Sauer, Philipp Engel

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Interspecies interaction controlsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Hypersensitivity of chitin degradation to initial species densities due to monomer diffusion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Silvia BrochetDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6443-185X
Andrew QuinnDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1401-1053
Ruben A T MarsInstitute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Nicolas NeuschwanderDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Uwe SauerInstitute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5923-0770
Philipp EngelDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4678-6200

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecological processes underlying bacterial coexistence in the gut are not well understood. Here, we disentangled the effect of the host and the diet on the coexistence of four closely related

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriaBeesCommunicable DiseasesDietEcologyFlavonoidsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeLactobacillusMetabolomicsPlant ExtractsPollenSugarsSymbiosisTranscriptomeFlavonoidsPlant ExtractsSugarsbacterial coexistenceecologygut microbiotahoney beeinfectious diseaselactobacillus firm5microbiologyniche partitioning

Identifiers

PMID34279218
PMCPMC8456714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.