Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34278769›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health research2021

A pre/post analysis of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the psychosocial work environment and recovery among healthcare workers in a large university hospital in Sweden.

Ingibjörg H Jonsdottir, Alessio Degl'Innocenti, Linda Ahlstrom, Caterina Finizia, Helle Wijk, Magnus Åkerström

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ingibjörg H JonsdottirRegion Västra Götaland, Institute of Stress Medicine, Gothenburg; School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg. ingibjorg.jonsdottir@vgregion.se.
Alessio Degl'InnocentiDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Centre for Ethics, Law and Mental Health (CELAM), Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg. alessio.deglinnocenti@vgregion.se.
Linda AhlstromInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg; Department of Orthopaedics, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg . linda.ahlstrom@gu.se.
Caterina FiniziaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg; Department of Research, Development, Education and Innovation, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg . caterina.finizia@vgregion.se.
Helle WijkInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg. helle.wijk@gu.se.
Magnus ÅkerströmInstitute of Stress Medicine, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg; School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg. magnus.akerstrom@vgregion.se.
University of Gothenburg · SEChalmers University of Technology · SERegion Västra Götaland · SESahlgrenska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on workload, mental health, and well-being of healthcare workers, and particularly those on the front-line, has received considerable attention. DESIGN AND

methodsWe surveyed hospital employees about their working environment during the pandemic and identified departments which were negatively affected in comparison to the pre-pandemic situation, as well as factors contributing to this. Setting and participants We surveyed all hospital employees at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden in September 2020 and compared results across departments and to the results of a large employee survey from October 2019.

resultsThe overall impact of the pandemic on perceived working conditions and possibility for recovery differed among departments. During the pandemic, healthcare workers working with COVID-19 patients reported poorer working environments than other employees. Factors significantly related to perception of work environment and recovery during the pandemic included worries of being infected, departmental transfer, and having insufficient access to personal protective equipment. Men reported better working conditions than women in all, but one item and higher age was related to better perceived working environment.

conclusionsOur results indicate that the pandemic differentially affects hospital departments and underscores the multifactorial nature of this topic. Contributing factors to poor perceived working environment could be addressed at times of high workload, such as during the pandemic, including providing appropriate support to managers, ensuring possibility for recovery during working hours, and acknowledging worries about infection. Young healthcare workers and staff who are relocated due to the pandemic warrant special attention.

Identifiers

PMID34278769
PMCPMC8715269
OpenAlexW3186454777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.