Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34278309›Full record

ArticleCritical care explorations2021

Written Care Summaries Facilitate Communication Between Families and Providers of ICU Patients: A Pilot Study.

Jeffrey L Bulger, Thomas V Quinn, Crystal M Glover, Santosh Basapur, Raj C Shah, Jared A Greenberg

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care explorations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06969196 (Artificial Intelligence-Generated Written Communication for Families of Intensive Care Unit Patients - A Pilot Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06969196 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Artificial Intelligence-Generated Written Communication for Families of Intensive Care Unit Patients - A Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorRush University Medical CenterRan2025 to 2025Enrolled27ConditionsCommunication, ICUArmsWritten Communicatoin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeffrey L BulgerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Thomas V QuinnDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Crystal M GloverRush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Santosh BasapurOffice of Project Management, Academic Support Services, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Raj C ShahRush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Jared A GreenbergDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Rush University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ICU providers may invite families to participate in daily rounds to inform them of the patient's condition and to support their emotional well-being. Daily written summaries of care may provide complementary benefits.

designQualitative interviews with surrogates of ICU patients who received daily written summaries of care.

settingSingle, urban academic medical center. PATIENTS/SUBJECTS: A convenience sample of 30 surrogates of nondecisional, medical ICU patients.

interventionsDaily written summaries detailed each of the patient's main ICU problems, the presumed causes of each of the problems, and the medical team's plan to address each of the problems for each ICU day. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsThere were four ways that written summaries affected the participant's experience: 1) providing clarity to participants regarding the patient's condition, 2) facilitating participant understanding of the patient's clinical course, 3) facilitating communication between participants and medical providers, and 4) facilitating communication between participants and other family members. Overarching themes were that summaries were understandable, had appropriate level of detail, and added value to the ICU experience.

conclusionsIn this pilot study, family members had positive impressions of receiving daily written summaries of care. Further study is needed to determine the extent to which written communication may affect family and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

communicationfamily engagementintensive care unit family experience

Identifiers

PMID34278309
PMCPMC8280084
OpenAlexW3185976180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.