Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34278288›Full record

ArticleForensic science international. Synergy2021

Demonstrating cost-benefit for forensic laboratory resources: Project Resolution.

Ray A Wickenheiser

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science international. Synergy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Why forensic scientists are essential workers.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Proactive crime scene response optimizes crime investigation.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023
    Article
  6. Interpol review of forensic management, 2019-2022.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Expanding DNA database effectiveness.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ray A WickenheiserNew York State Police Crime Laboratory System, 1200 Washington Avenue, Building 30, Albany, NY, 12226-3000, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mission of forensic laboratories is to maximize the value of evidence. As price and quality are relatively fixed for consumers of forensic analysis, the main measure of service effectiveness is timeliness. Resources have been demonstrated as the means to improve timeliness. However, as the availability of governmental resources is also relatively fixed, to optimize resource distribution, there must be an evaluation as to the most effective allocation. Cost-benefit analysis or determination of the return on investment has been demonstrated as an objective means to compare various competing options as targets for resource deployment. Therefore, a cost-benefit analysis of forensic science will be conducted to evaluate the option of applying additional resources to maximize the value of forensic analysis through optimal timeliness of service. A case study will be provided using historical data to examine the net benefit from forensic investigative leads.

Indexed as

BacklogCase studyCost-benefitForensic laboratoryNo-suspect sexual assaultProject ResolutionRecidivismResources

Identifiers

PMID34278288
PMCPMC8267537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.