Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34278282›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2021

Examining the effects of HIV self-testing compared to standard HIV testing services in the general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Muhammad S Jamil, Ingrid Eshun-Wilson, T Charles Witzel, Nandi Siegfried, Carmen Figueroa, Lastone Chitembo, Busisiwe Msimanga-Radebe, Muhammad S Pasha, Karin Hatzold, Elizabeth Corbett and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Muhammad S JamilGlobal HIV, Hepatitis and STIs Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ingrid Eshun-WilsonWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St Louis, United States.
T Charles WitzelDepartment of Public Health, Environments & Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Nandi SiegfriedIndependent Clinical Epidemiologist, Cape Town, South Africa.
Carmen FigueroaGlobal HIV, Hepatitis and STIs Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Lastone ChitemboWorld Health Organization Country Office for Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Busisiwe Msimanga-RadebeWorld Health Organization Country Office for South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.
Muhammad S PashaWorld Health Organization Country Office for Pakistan, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Karin HatzoldPopulation Services International, Cape Town, South Africa.
Elizabeth CorbettDepartment of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Magdalena Barr-DiChiaraGlobal HIV, Hepatitis and STIs Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Alison J RodgerInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Peter WeatherburnDepartment of Public Health, Environments & Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Elvin GengWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St Louis, United States.
Rachel BaggaleyGlobal HIV, Hepatitis and STIs Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Cheryl JohnsonGlobal HIV, Hepatitis and STIs Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
World Health Organization · CHRoyal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · GBWashington University in St. Louis · USUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBWorld Health Organization - Pakistan · PKWorld Health Organization - Zambia · ZM

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences (KL2) KL2TR002346 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Dominic N Reeds · 2017 to 2026
$14.0M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002346Wellcome Trust 200901/Z/16/ZWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe updated a 2017 systematic review and compared the effects of HIV self-testing (HIVST) to standard HIV testing services to understand effective service delivery models among the general population.

methodsWe included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing testing outcomes with HIVST to standard testing in the general population and published between January 1, 2006 and June 4, 2019. Random effects meta-analysis was conducted and pooled risk ratios (RRs) were reported. The certainty of evidence was determined using the GRADE methodology.

findingsWe identified 14 eligible RCTs, 13 of which were conducted in sub-Saharan Africa. Support provided to self-testers ranged from no/basic support to one-on-one in-person support. HIVST increased testing uptake overall (RR:2.09; 95% confidence interval: 1.69-2.58;

interpretationHIVST appears to be safe and effective among the general population in sub-Saharan Africa with a range of delivery models. It identified and linked additional people with HIV to care. These findings support the wider availability of HIVST to reach those who may not otherwise access testing.

Indexed as

general populationHIV self-testingHIV testing servicesMeta-analysisSystematic Review

Identifiers

PMID34278282
PMCPMC8271120
OpenAlexW3182981674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.