ArticleEClinicalMedicine2021
Global breast cancer incidence and mortality trends by region, age-groups, and fertility patterns.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 161 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
161 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 290 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy vs core needle biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2026Pooled it
- Health belief model-based educational interventions for knowledge, beliefs, and intentions on mammography: a systematic review.BMC women's health · 2025Pooled it
- Breast cancer survival rates and determinants in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Rehmannia glutinosa for perimenopausal syndrome in patients with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Saudi medical journal · 2025Pooled it
- ESR Essentials: screening for breast cancer - general recommendations by EUSOBI.European radiology · 2024Guideline
- Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of breast cancer in Ethiopia: a systematic review.BMC cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Reducing re-excision rates in breast conserving surgery with Margin Probe: systematic review.The British journal of surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Impact of Physical Rehabilitation on Bone Biomarkers in Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy of Antiresorptive Drugs on Bone Mineral Density in Post-Menopausal Women With Early Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Aromatase Inhibitors: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Developing and testing health warnings about alcohol and risk for breast cancer: Results from a national experiment with young adult women in the United States.Alcohol, clinical & experimental research · 2025Trial
- Genetic and lifestyle factors for breast cancer risk assessment in Southeast China.Cancer medicine · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Optimizing AI-assisted decision-making in mammography screening: focusing on uncertainties.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Guiding Risk Reduction for Breast Cancer-Relevant Chemicals (BC-Chems): Chemical Production Volumes, Sources, Intake Levels, Emissions, and Regulations.Environmental health perspectives · 2026Article
- The Increasing Importance of Breast Cancer in the United Arab Emirates.Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology · 2026Review
- The NorthMom study: population-based follow-up of women in a birth cohort to assess pregnancy exposures and effects on breast cancer risk factors.BMC public health · 2026Observational
- Breast cancer mortality by age and race and/or ethnicity across counties in the United States, 2000-2019.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
- Review
- Knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a cross-sectional study in Jordan.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Circulating Free miRNAs as Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers for Early Detection of Breast Cancer in Peruvian Women.Cancers · 2026Article
101 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer (BC) has been increasing globally, though it is unclear whether the increases are seen across all age groups and regions and whether changes in rates can be primarily attributed to decreasing fertility rates. We investigated age-specific trends in BC incidence and mortality from 1990 to 2017, worldwide and by region, and evaluated whether incidence trends are explained by decreases in fertility.
methodsWe used country-level data to examine trends in BC incidence and mortality rates from 1990 to 2017 by region and age group. Linear mixed models were used to estimate age-specific rates from baseline models of year and were compared to fertility-adjusted models for incidence.
resultsThe global BC mortality rate increased overall by 0.23% per year (95% CI=0.20, 0.25), with statistically significant increases in the under 50 and 70 and over age groups, and in 5 out of 7 regions. The global BC incidence rate increased overall by 1.44% per year (95% CI=1.42, 1.47), with statistically significant increases in all age groups, and in 6 out of 7 regions. After adjusting for fertility, the incidence annual percent change (APC) remained statistically significant (APC=0.84, 95% CI=0.81, 0.88), in all age groups, and in 6 of 7 regions.
interpretationThe global increase in BC mortality is seen in most age groups and regions. The global increase in BC incidence is seen in all age groups and is highest in women under 50; increases remained in most regions even after considering declining fertility rates.
fundingBreast Cancer Research Foundation and National Cancer Institute.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.