ArticleThe British and Irish orthoptic journal2021
The Accuracy of GP Referrals into Manchester Royal Eye Hospital Orthoptic Department.
Article in The British and Irish orthoptic journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhancing Paediatric and Strabismus Ophthalmology Departments in Spain Through the Inclusion of Orthoptists: Insights from a Nationwide Survey.The British and Irish orthoptic journal · 2024Article
- Assessment of optometrists' referral accuracy and contributing factors: A review.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is little research that examines the accuracy of paediatric referrals into secondary and tertiary care, particularly those from general practicioners (GPs) to ophthalmology and orthoptic departments. Inaccurate referrals could have a detrimental effect on service delivery and NHS funding as well as patient experience. Available evidence shows GP referral accuracy to range between 39% and 90% across different areas of medicine with accuracy of GP referral to ophthalmology between 56% and 66%.
methodsA retrospective case note analysis was carried out on 99 case notes to examine the accuracy of paediatric GP referrals (including those via the community optometrist) into the Orthoptic Department at Manchester Royal Eye Hospital (MREH).
resultsGP referral accuracy was found to be 63% for strabismus cases, 50% for reduced vision/amblyopia cases, 45% for NAD cases, 100% of nystagmus cases and 92% of "other" cases. GPs were significantly less accurate than community optometrists (p = 0.01). Referrals from GPs alone had an accuracy rate of 65% compared to 87% of GP referral via community optometrist. Accuracy of referral appeared to improve with age, however this was not found to be statistically significant (p = 0.06).
conclusionThis study found orthoptic referral accuracy for GPs in Manchester to be similar to other areas of medicine. While acceptable compared to other areas of medicine, improving referral accuracy is essential to improve NHS spending, service delivery, and patient experience. To aid with this the aim is to design and implement a virtual training package that focuses on detection of strabismus to improve referral accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.