Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34278054›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Where Are the Women in Radiation Oncology? A Cross-Sectional Multi-Specialty Comparative Analysis.

Bismarck Odei, Jenna Kahn, Emma Brey Holliday, Dayssy Alexandra Diaz, Erika Bello-Pardo, James Odei, Junu Bae, Andrea Arnett, Raju Raval, Darrion Mitchell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Gender disparities in academic radiation oncology research: A narrative review.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2027
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Shaping the future of radiation oncology education: results of a nationwide student survey from Germany.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Gender parity in radiation oncology in Germany: a 2024 analysis of professional roles and academic training.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  6. The underestimated role of pioneering women in radiation oncology: lessons from the past for today's practice.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Bismarck OdeiOhio State University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbus, Ohio.
Jenna KahnOregon Health and Science University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Portland, Oregon.
Emma Brey HollidayMD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston, Texas.
Dayssy Alexandra DiazOhio State University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbus, Ohio.
Erika Bello-PardoOhio State University, School of Public Health, Columbus, Ohio.
James OdeiOhio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, Ohio.
Junu BaeOhio State University, School of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio.
Andrea ArnettOhio State University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbus, Ohio.
Raju RavalOhio State University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbus, Ohio.
Darrion MitchellOhio State University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbus, Ohio.
Ohio State University Hospital · USThe Ohio State University · USOhio Department of Health · USOregon Health & Science University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to evaluate the growth of women within the general radiation oncology (RO) workforce in comparison to the growth among other medical specialties. We also sought to create a predictive model for gender diversity to guide future recruitment efforts. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We identified 16 medical specialties, including RO, for analyses. We used data from the Association of American Colleges and assessed female representation at 4 time points (2006, 2011, 2016, and 2020). Additionally, we determined characteristics of medical specialties that were predictive of increased gender diversity. We performed univariate statistical analysis with linear regression to evaluate factors predictive of greater gender diversity among the medical specialties in our cohort.

resultsThe proportion of women within the represented specialties increased over time. Obstetrics/gynecology (14,750 [2006], 23,921 [2020]; 18.7% absolute growth) and dermatology (3568 [2006], 6329 [2020]; 15.1% absolute growth) experienced the highest absolute growth in female representation between 2006 and 2020. When assessing changes between various time points in RO, the absolute change in female physicians increased by 1.5% between 2006 and 2011, by 2.2% between 2011 and 2016, and by only 0.4% between 2016 and 2020, which was the lowest growth pattern relative to the other 15 specialties. Factors predictive of gender diversity among specialties were lower average step 1 scores (

conclusionsThe percentage of women in RO lags behind other medical specialties and has been notably low in the last few years. Interventions that incorporate novel initiatives proposed within this study may accelerate current recruitment milestones.

Identifiers

PMID34278054
PMCPMC8267431
OpenAlexW3166253607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.