Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34278008›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2021

PSMA-11-PET/CT versus choline-PET/CT to guide stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for androgen deprivation therapy deferral in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer.

Charlotte L Deijen, Gerbert L Vrijenhoek, Eva E Schaake, Wouter V Vogel, Luc M F Moonen, Floris J Pos, Henk G van der Poel, Gerben R Borst

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: Current Status and Future Challenges.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The Promise of Metastasis-Directed Therapy for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: Going Beneath the Surface with Molecular Imaging.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Charlotte L DeijenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gerbert L VrijenhoekDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eva E SchaakeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wouter V VogelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Luc M F MoonenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Floris J PosDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Henk G van der PoelDepartment of Urology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gerben R BorstDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn patients with oligometastatic recurrent prostate cancer, standard treatment is androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). However, ADT has many potential side effects that may result in impaired quality of life. Early identification to select patients suitable for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is of utmost importance to prevent or delay start of ADT and its side effects. Because Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-11-Positron Emission Tomography (PSMA-11-PET) has a higher sensitivity than choline-PET, we hypothesise that PSMA-11-PET based SABR results in longer response duration and subsequent longer delay in starting ADT than choline-PET.

methodsPatients with oligometastatic (≤4 metastases) recurrent prostate cancer (with no local recurrence) based on PSMA-11-PET or choline-PET treated with SABR from January 2012 until December 2017 were included. Primary endpoint was ADT-free survival. Secondary endpoints were Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) response after SABR and time to PSA rise after SABR.

resultsFifty patients (n = 40 PSMA-11-PET and n = 10 choline-PET) with in total 72 lesions were included. Median follow-up was 24.3 months. PSMA-11-PET enabled eligibility of patients with lower PSA levels than choline-PET (median 1.8 versus 4.2 ng/mL, p = 0.03). The PSMA-11-PET group had a significant longer PSA response duration (median 34.0 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 16.0-52.0) versus 14.7 months (95% CI 4.7-24.7), p = 0.004) with a subsequent longer ADT-free survival (median 32.7 months (95% CI, 20.8-44.5) versus 14.9 months (95% CI, 5.7-24.1), p = 0.01).

conclusionsWith PSMA-11-PET we are able to select patients with oligometastatic recurrent prostate cancer suitable for SABR in an earlier disease stage at lower PSA levels. PSMA-11-PET guided SABR resulted in a significant longer response duration and ADT-free survival compared with choline-PET and can therefore prevent or delay ADT related side effects.

Indexed as

Androgen deprivation therapyOligometastasesProstate cancerPSMA-11-PETSABR

Identifiers

PMID34278008
PMCPMC8261473
OpenAlexW3173730519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.