Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34277890›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2021

What do experts look at and what do experts find when reading mammograms?

Jeremy M Wolfe, Chia-Chien Wu, Jonathan Li, Sneha B Suresh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Visual attention graph.Behavior research methods · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Errors in visual search: Are they stochastic or deterministic?Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jeremy M WolfeBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6475-1984
Chia-Chien WuBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Jonathan LiMelbourne Medical School, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sneha B SureshBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.

Funding

Prevalence effects in visual search: Theoretical and practical implicationsR01EY017001 · NEI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Jeremy M Wolfe · 2007 to 2026
$8.2M
Improving Perception in Digital Breast TomographyR01CA207490 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI WOLFE, JEREMY M · 2016 to 2025
$4.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA207490NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Attentioneye movementsmammogramuseful field of viewvisual search

Identifiers

PMID34277890
PMCPMC8277193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.