Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34277834›Full record

ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2021

The role of gut microbiome in modulating response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in cancer.

Abdul Rafeh Naqash, Alba J Kihn-Alarcón, Chara Stavraka, Kathleen Kerrigan, Saman Maleki Vareki, David James Pinato, Sonam Puri

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Immune Checkpoints in Endometriosis-A New Insight in the Pathogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Abdul Rafeh NaqashDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Alba J Kihn-AlarcónDepartment of Research, Liga Nacional Contra el Cáncer & Instituto de Cancerología, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Chara StavrakaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, UK.
Kathleen KerriganDivision of Medical Oncology Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Saman Maleki VarekiDivision of Experimental Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
David James PinatoDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK.
Sonam PuriDivision of Medical Oncology Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Huntsman Cancer Institute · USGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBImperial College London · GBLawson Health Research Institute · CALiga Nacional Contra el Cáncer · GTNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy has led to a paradigm shift in the treatment of several cancers. There have been significant efforts to identify biomarkers that can predict response and toxicities related to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPI) therapy. Despite these advances, it has been challenging to tease out why a subset of patients benefit more than others or why certain patients experience immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Although the immune-modulating properties of the human gut bacterial ecosystem are yet to be fully elucidated, there has been growing interest in evaluating the role of the gut microbiome in shaping the therapeutic response to cancer immunotherapy. Considerable research efforts are currently directed to utilizing metagenomic and metabolic profiling of stool microbiota in patients on ICPI-based therapies. Dysbiosis or loss of microbial diversity has been associated with a poor treatment response to ICPIs and worse survival outcomes in cancer patients. Emerging data have shown that certain bacterial strains, such as

Indexed as

Gut microbiomeimmunotherapyresponsetoxicity

Identifiers

PMID34277834
PMCPMC8267312
OpenAlexW3135113126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.