ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021
Clinical course and outcomes of COVID-19 patients with a history of cerebrovascular disease: a retrospective study in Wuhan.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundData on patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who have pre-existing cerebrovascular disease (CVD) are scarce. This study set out to describe the clinical course and outcomes of these patients.
methodsThis single-center retrospective study was performed at Huoshenshan Hospital in Wuhan, China. Patients with confirmed COVID-19 who had pre-existing CVD (N=69) were identified. COVID-19 patients without CVD were randomly selected and matched by age and sex to the patients with CVD. Clinical data were analyzed and compared between the 2 groups. The composite endpoint included intensive care unit admission, use of mechanical ventilation, and death. Multivariable Cox regression analyses with control for medical comorbidities were used to examine the relationship between pre-existing CVD and clinical outcome of COVID-19.
resultsCompared with patients without CVD, patients with pre-existing CVD were more likely to present with unapparent symptoms at first; however, at admission, these patients tended to be in a severer condition than those without CVD, with more underlying hypertension and diabetes. The levels of interleukin-6, creative kinase MB, aspartate transaminase, and creatinine, as well as prothrombin time, were also markedly higher in patients with CVD. Patients with pre-existing CVD were more likely to develop multi-organ dysfunction, deteriorate to critical condition, and yield poorer clinical outcomes than patients without CVD. Concerning therapeutics, greater proportions of patients with pre-existing CVD required mechanical ventilation, higher-order anti-bacterials, and drugs targeting underlying diseases and complications. In the multivariable analysis, pre-existing CVD was significantly associated with a poor clinical outcome.
conclusionsPatients with a history of CVD are more vulnerable to an over-activated inflammatory response and subsequent multi-organ dysfunction, resulting in a poor clinical outcome. Close monitoring is advisable for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.