ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021
The use of explainable artificial intelligence to explore types of fenestral otosclerosis misdiagnosed when using temporal bone high-resolution computed tomography.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of explainable artificial intelligence in disease prediction: a systematic literature review and future research directions.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Pooled it
- Image-based deep learning in otology: a state-of-the-art review.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- Clinical impact of an explainable machine learning with amino acid PET imaging: application to the diagnosis of aggressive glioma.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Otosclerosis Detection: A Pilot Study.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- Deep Learning Techniques and Imaging in Otorhinolaryngology-A State-of-the-Art Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Temporal Bone Imaging: Advances and Future Challenges.Cureus · 2023Review
- Essential properties and explanation effectiveness of explainable artificial intelligence in healthcare: A systematic review.Heliyon · 2023Review
- Research and application progress in deep learning in otology.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2023Article
- Applications of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Diagnosis and Surgery.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study was to explore the common characteristics of fenestral otosclerosis (OS) which are misdiagnosed, and develop a deep learning model for the diagnosis of fenestral OS based on temporal bone high-resolution computed tomography scans.
methodsWe conducted a study to explicitly analyze the clinical performance of otolaryngologists in diagnosing fenestral OS and developed an explainable deep learning model using 134,574 temporal bone high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) slices collected from 1,294 patients for the automatic diagnosis of fenestral OS. We prospectively created an external test set with 31,774 CT slices from 144 patients, which contained 86 fenestral OS ears and 202 normal ears and used it to evaluate the performance of our otosclerosis-Logical Neural Network (LNN) model to assess its potential clinical utility. In addition, we compared the diagnostic acumen of seven otolaryngologists with the otosclerosis-LNN approach in the clinical test set, which was mixed with 78 fenestral OS and 62 normal ears. Finally, to evaluate the assisting value of the model, the seven participants were again invited to classify all cases in the clinical test set after referring to the diagnostic results of the model, to which they were blinded.
resultsThe diagnostic performance of otologists was not satisfactory, and those CT samples which were misdiagnosed had similar characteristics. Based on this finding, we defined three subtypes of fenestral OS lesions that are suitable for clinical diagnosis guidance: "focal", "transitional", and "typical" fenestral OS. The most encouraging result is that the model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 99.5% (per-ear-sensitivity of 96.4%, per-ear-specificity of 98.9%) on the prospective unknown external test. Furthermore, we used this model to assist otologists and observed a consistent and significant improvement in diagnostic performance, especially for the newly defined focal and transitional fenestral OS, which led to the initial high misdiagnosis rate.
conclusionsOur findings of the fine-grained classification of fenestral OS could have implications for future diagnosis and prevention programs. In addition, our deep OS localization network is an effective approach providing assistance to otologists to deal with the significant challenge of the misdiagnosis of fenestral OS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.