Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34277713›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular biosciences2021

RNA 3D Structure Prediction Using Coarse-Grained Models.

Jun Li, Shi-Jie Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Fitting coarse-grained models to macroscopic experimental data via automatic differentiation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Embracing exascale computing in nucleic acid simulations.Current opinion in structural biology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. RNA 3D Structure Prediction: Progress and Perspective.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jun LiDepartments of Physics and Biochemistry, and Institute of Data Science and Informatics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
Shi-Jie ChenDepartments of Physics and Biochemistry, and Institute of Data Science and Informatics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.

Funding

New methods for computational modeling of RNA structuresR35GM134919 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI SHI-JIE CHEN · 2020 to 2026
$3.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM134919
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The three-dimensional (3D) structures of Ribonucleic acid (RNA) molecules are essential to understanding their various and important biological functions. However, experimental determination of the atomic structures is laborious and technically difficult. The large gap between the number of sequences and the experimentally determined structures enables the thriving development of computational approaches to modeling RNAs. However, computational methods based on all-atom simulations are intractable for large RNA systems, which demand long time simulations. Facing such a challenge, many coarse-grained (CG) models have been developed. Here, we provide a review of CG models for modeling RNA 3D structures, compare the performance of the different models, and offer insights into potential future developments.

Indexed as

all-atom force fieldcoarse-grainedmolecular dynamicsmonte carloRNAstatistical potentialstructure prediction

Identifiers

PMID34277713
PMCPMC8283274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.