Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34277329›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2021

Why are some people reluctant to be vaccinated for COVID-19? A cross-sectional survey among U.S. Adults in May-June 2020.

Jennifer D Allen, Wenhui Feng, Laura Corlin, Thalia Porteny, Andrea Acevedo, Deborah Schildkraut, Erin King, Keren Ladin, Qiang Fu, Thomas J Stopka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. New-onset aplastic anemia after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.International journal of hematology · 2023
    Review
  6. Translational Bioethics and Public Health.American journal of public health · 2023
    Article
  7. Evaluation of the safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with MS, NMOSD, and MOGAD.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jennifer D AllenDepartment of Community Health, Tufts University, 574 Boston Ave, Medford, MA 02155, USA.
Wenhui FengDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Laura CorlinDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Thalia PortenyDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Tufts University, 574 Boston Ave, Medford, MA 02155, USA.
Andrea AcevedoDepartment of Community Health, Tufts University, 574 Boston Ave, Medford, MA 02155, USA.
Deborah SchildkrautDepartment of Political Science, Tufts University, Packard Hall, Medford, MA 02155, USA.
Erin KingDepartment of Clinical Science, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, 200 Westboro Road, North Grafton, MA 01536, USA.
Keren LadinDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Qiang FuDepartment of Community Health, Tufts University, 574 Boston Ave, Medford, MA 02155, USA.
Thomas J StopkaDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding reasons for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is necessary to ensure maximum uptake, needed for herd immunity. We conducted a cross-sectional online survey between May 29-June 20, 2020 among a national sample of U.S. adults ages 18 years and over to assess cognitive, attitudinal and normative beliefs associated with not intending to get a COVID-19 vaccine. Of 1219 respondents, 17.7% said that they would not get a vaccine and 24.2% were unsure. In multivariable analyses controlled for gender, age, income, education, religious affiliation, health insurance coverage, and political party affiliation, those who reported that they were unwilling be vaccinated (versus those who were willing) were less likely to agree that vaccines are safe/effective (Relative Risk Ratio (RRR): 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.31, 0.66), that everyone has a responsibility to be vaccinated (RRR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.30, 0.52), that public authorities should be able to mandate vaccination (RRR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.58, 0.98), and more likely to believe that if everyone else were vaccinated they would not need a vaccine (RRR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.78). Our results suggest that health messages should emphasize the safety and efficacy of vaccines, as well as the fact that vaccinating oneself is important, even if the level of uptake in the community is high.

Indexed as

AttitudesCoronavirusCOVID-19Health disparitiesUnited StatesVaccine

Identifiers

PMID34277329
PMCPMC8277541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.