Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34277327›Full record

ArticleAllergo journal international2021

Face masks suitable for preventing COVID-19 and pollen allergy. A study in the exposure chamber.

Karl-Christian Bergmann, Sebastian Kugler, Torsten Zuberbier, Sylvia Becker

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Allergo journal international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Treatment of Allergies to Fur Animals.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. The Impact of the Pandemic on Cat and Dog Allergies.Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. A Review of the Role of Pollen in COVID-19 Infection.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Pneumo news · 2022
    Article
  14. Allergo Journal : interdisziplinare Zeitschrift fur Allergologie und Umweltmedizin : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Allergie- und Immunitatsforschung · 2022
    Review
  15. Olfactory and gustatory disorders in COVID-19.Allergo journal international · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karl-Christian BergmannAllergie-Centrum-Charité, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0306-9922
Sebastian KuglerECARF (European Centre for Allergy Research Foundation), Berlin, Germany.
Torsten ZuberbierAllergie-Centrum-Charité, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Sylvia BeckerECARF (European Centre for Allergy Research Foundation), Berlin, Germany.
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic, the population in Germany has been asked to wear face masks in public areas. The masks are accepted by the public. People with a pollen allergy have an interest in knowing whether masks can also provide protection against pollen and thus prevent symptoms even without medication.

methodIn order to evaluate the potential 'antipollen effect' of face masks, 14 adults with confirmed grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis were exposed to grass pollen for a period of two hours following a standardised protocol. The test was conducted outside of the grass pollen season. The subjects wore either no mask, a medical mask or a FFP2 mask.

resultsSubjects wearing either mask were clearly able to avoid both nasal and conjunctival symptoms. There were no significant differences between the two masks in terms of effect. Mask wearing to prevent pollen exposure clearly supports overall well-being.

conclusionWearing a mask during pollen season can be recommended as an effective nondrug option for people with a pollen allergy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40629-021-00180-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Indexed as

Allergic rhinoconjunctivitisPollenPollen allergyProtection to pollenSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34277327
PMCPMC8278371
OpenAlexW3178366697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.