Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34277318›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2021

Psychological and Aesthetic Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients.

Maria V Ermoshchenkova, Aziz D Zikiryahodjaev, Igor V Reshetov, Dmitriy S Svyatoslavov, Mikhail Y Sinelnikov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Maria V ErmoshchenkovaDepartment of Oncology, Radiotherapy and Plastic Surgery, First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Aziz D ZikiryahodjaevDepartment of Oncology, Radiotherapy and Plastic Surgery, First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Igor V ReshetovThe P.A. Herzen Moscow Cancer Research Institute - Branch of the Federal State Budgetary Institution "National Medical Research Center of Radiology" at the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation.
Dmitriy S SvyatoslavovThe P.A. Herzen Moscow Cancer Research Institute - Branch of the Federal State Budgetary Institution "National Medical Research Center of Radiology" at the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation.
Mikhail Y SinelnikovDepartment of Oncology, Radiotherapy and Plastic Surgery, First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation · RUMoscow City Oncology Hospital №62 · RUP.A. Hertzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute · RUResearch Institute of Human Morphology · RUSechenov University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients who undergo breast cancer treatment require psychosocial and aesthetic rehabilitation. Advantages of breast reconstruction in-patient rehabilitation are well known. Oncoplastic organ-preserving surgery offers aesthetically better results, yet is often considered less safe than more radical procedures. We compared the aesthetic and psychological outcomes in patients undergoing breast reconstruction and oncoplastic breast cancer treatment.

methodsIn total, 1130 patients who received either breast reconstruction or oncoplastic breast cancer surgery were included in the study. Patients were classified into two groups. Group 1 included 510 patients who received breast reconstruction surgery. Group 2 included 620 patients who received oncoplastic surgery. The following aspects were compared between the two groups: demographics, tumor progression, and immunohistochemical aspects, complications, hospitalization stay, and psychological and aesthetic outcomes.

resultsPatients in the oncoplastic group showed statistically significant higher psychosocial and aesthetic outcomes, as well as lower incidence of complications, revision rate, disease progression, and recurrence. The majority of oncoplastic patients were treated in early stages of breast cancer.

conclusionOffering superior treatment results, oncoplastic organ-preserving surgery should be favored in patients with earlier stages of cancer progression.

Identifiers

PMID34277318
PMCPMC8277256
OpenAlexW3186560562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.