Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34277050›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2021

Development and validation of a nomogram to predict anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma.

Wen-Quan Yu, Hui-Jiang Gao, Guo-Dong Shi, Jia-Yu Tang, Hua-Feng Wang, Shi-Yu Hu, Yu-Cheng Wei

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wen-Quan YuThoracic Surgeon, Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Hui-Jiang GaoThoracic Surgeon, Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Guo-Dong ShiThoracic Surgeon, Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Jia-Yu TangThoracic Surgeon, Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Hua-Feng WangThoracic Surgeon, Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Shi-Yu HuThoracic Surgeon, Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Yu-Cheng WeiThoracic Surgeon, Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University · CNQingdao University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to identify variables associated with anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy and established a tool for anastomotic leakage prediction.

methodsTwenty-six preoperative and postoperative variables were retrospectively collected from esophageal cancer patients who were treated with radical esophagectomy from January 2018 to June 2020 in the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University. SPSS Version 23.0 and Empower Stats software were used for establishing a nomogram after screening relevant variables by univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses. The established nomogram was identified by depicting the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration curve, which was verified by 1,000 bootstrap resamples method.

resultsA total of 604 eligible esophageal cancer patients were included, of which 51 (8.4%) patients had anastomotic leakage. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that smoking, anastomotic location, anastomotic technique, prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and ASA score were independent risks of anastomotic leakage. The area under curve (AUC) of ROC in the established nomogram was 0.764 (95% CI, 0.69-0.83). The internal validation confirmed that the nomogram had a great discrimination ability (AUC =0.766). Depicted calibration curve demonstrated a well-fitted prediction and observation probability. In addition, the decision curve analysis concluded that the newly established nomogram is significant for clinical decision-making.

conclusionsThis nomogram provided the individual prediction of anastomotic leakage for esophageal cancer patients after surgery, which might benefit treatment results for patients and clinicians, as well as pre-and postoperative intervention strategy-making.

Indexed as

anastomotic leakageEsophageal canceresophagectomynomogramprediction model

Identifiers

PMID34277050
PMCPMC8264723
OpenAlexW3167033036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.