Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34277049›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2021

Efficacy of whole lung lavage in pulmonary alveolar proteinosis: a 20-year experience at a reference center in Thailand.

Punchalee Kaenmuang, Asma Navasakulpong

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Outcomes and outcome measures in studies of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis: a scoping review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Comprehensive Outlook on Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis-A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Punchalee KaenmuangDivision of Respiratory and Respiratory Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkhla University, Hat Yai, Thailand.
Asma NavasakulpongDivision of Respiratory and Respiratory Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkhla University, Hat Yai, Thailand.
Prince of Songkla University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) is a rare lung syndrome. The current standard treatment is whole lung lavage (WLL). We reviewed PAP cases treated with WLL during a 243-month period. The primary objective was to describe the efficacy of WLL. We compared chest imaging resolution and pulmonary function tests (PaO

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed PAP patients from 1 January 2000 to 31 March 2020. Demographic data, pulmonary function tests, and the efficacy of WLL were collected from the electronic medical database and analyzed by descriptive analysis. Differences in data used the student

resultsA total of 19 PAP patients and 50 WLL procedures were included. Eleven patients (57.9%) were females and the mean age was 51.5±11.7 years. Dyspnea (100%) and cough (94.7%) were the two leading symptoms. The most common indication for WLL was progressive dyspnea. There were significant improvements in SpO

conclusionsWLL is an effective standard treatment for PAP cases. It is safe and can be used as a primary treatment in case of inhaled anti GM-CSF is not available.

Indexed as

Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP)surfactantwhole lung lavage (WLL)

Identifiers

PMID34277049
PMCPMC8264701
OpenAlexW3171885048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.