ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2021
Defining and timing of palliative opportunities in children with central nervous system tumors.
Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Physician decision-making process about withholding/withdrawing life-sustaining treatments in paediatric patients: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.BMC palliative care · 2022Pooled it
- Integrating Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes and Palliative Care in Pediatric Advanced Cancer: The PediQUEST Response Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026Trial
- Palliative Care in Pediatric Oncology and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.Current oncology reports · 2022Review
- Palliative opportunities for patient-centered care in neuro-oncology patients.Neuro-oncology practice · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChildren with brain and central nervous system (CNS) tumors experience substantial challenges to their quality of life during their disease course. These challenges are opportunities for increased subspecialty palliative care (PC) involvement. Palliative opportunities have been defined in the pediatric oncology population, but the frequency, timing, and factors associated with palliative opportunities in pediatric patients with CNS tumors are unknown.
methodsA single-institution retrospective review was performed on children ages 0-18 diagnosed with a CNS tumor who died between January 1, 2012 and November 30, 2017. Nine palliative opportunities were defined prior to data collection (progression, relapse, admission for severe symptoms, intensive care admission, bone marrow transplant, phase 1 trial, hospice, do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order). Demographic, disease, treatment, palliative opportunity, and end-of-life data were collected. Opportunities were evaluated over quartiles from diagnosis to death.
resultsAmongst 101 patients with a median age at death of eight years (interquartile range [IQR] = 8.0, range 0-22), there was a median of seven (IQR = 6) palliative opportunities per patient, which increased closer to death. PC consultation occurred in 34 (33.7%) patients, at a median of 2.2 months before death, and was associated with having a DNR order (
conclusionChildren with CNS tumors suffered repeated events warranting PC yet received PC support only one-third of the time. Mapping palliative opportunities over the cancer course promotes earlier timing of PC consultation which can decrease suffering and resuscitation attempts at the end-of-life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.