Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34276926›Full record

ReviewChemical science2021

Directing transition metal-based oxygen-functionalization catalysis.

Gracita M Tomboc, Yeji Park, Kwangyeol Lee, Kyoungsuk Jin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. BrNature communications · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gracita M TombocDepartment of Chemistry and Research Institute for Natural Sciences, Korea University Seoul 02841 Republic of Korea kylee1@korea.ac.kr kysjin@korea.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6517-2036
Yeji ParkDepartment of Chemistry and Research Institute for Natural Sciences, Korea University Seoul 02841 Republic of Korea kylee1@korea.ac.kr kysjin@korea.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7086-7732
Kwangyeol LeeDepartment of Chemistry and Research Institute for Natural Sciences, Korea University Seoul 02841 Republic of Korea kylee1@korea.ac.kr kysjin@korea.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0575-7216
Kyoungsuk JinDepartment of Chemistry and Research Institute for Natural Sciences, Korea University Seoul 02841 Republic of Korea kylee1@korea.ac.kr kysjin@korea.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3009-6691

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review presents the recent progress of oxygen functionalization reactions based on non-electrochemical (conventional organic synthesis) and electrochemical methods. Although both methods have their advantages and limitations, the former approach has been used to synthesize a broader range of organic substances as the latter is limited by several factors, such as poor selectivity and high energy cost. However, because electrochemical methods can replace harmful terminal oxidizers with external voltage, organic electrosynthesis has emerged as greener and more eco-friendly compared to conventional organic synthesis. The progress of electrochemical methods toward oxygen functionalization is presented by an in-depth discussion of different types of electrically driven-chemical organic synthesis, with particular attention to recently developed electrochemical systems and catalyst designs. We hope to direct the attention of readers to the latest breakthroughs of traditional oxygen functionalization reactions and to the potential of electrochemistry for the transformation of organic substrates to useful end products.

Identifiers

PMID34276926
PMCPMC8261717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.