ArticlePrzeglad gastroenterologiczny
The prognostic value of serum and urine amylase levels and blood count parameters in assessing the risk of post-endoscopic pancreatitis development.
Article in Przeglad gastroenterologiczny. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDetection of post-endoscopic pancreatitis (PEP) in the first hours after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) can limit its consequences, while excluding it can provide safe discharge of the patient. Therefore, a simple, clinically available test is needed for this purpose.
aimThe assessment of the risk of PEP development based on serum and urine amylase levels and parameters included in blood counts 4 h after ERCP. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe study included 398 patients after therapeutic ERCP. Four hours after the procedure was completed, serum and urine amylase levels and blood count parameters were analysed.
resultsThe optimal serum amylase level for PEP detection was 516 UI/l, with ACC = 0.94, sens. 77.8%, spec. 0.95; positive predictive value (PPV) 0.412, negative predictive value (NPV) 0.98, positive likelihood factor (LR+) 14.93, and negative likelihood factor (LR-) 0.23. The serum amylase level for exclusion of PEP was 184 UI/l with ACC 0.79, sens. 0.83, spec. 0.79, PPV 0.16, NPV 0.99, and LR- 0.21. The optimal urine amylase level for detection and exclusion (based on Youden index) was 575 UI/l, sens. 83.33%, spec. 81.3%, PPV 0.172, NPV 0.99, LR+ 4.44, and LR- 0.20.
conclusionsSerum amylase levels above 516 UI/l at 4 h after ERCP should be an indication for further observation in hospital, and levels below 184 UI/l may justify safe discharge of the patient. Additional determinations of urine amylase levels and parameters included in blood counts do not improve the diagnostic capacity for the detection or exclusion of PEP risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.