Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34276762›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2021

Novel Reclassification of Adult Diabetes Is Useful to Distinguish Stages of β-Cell Function Linked to the Risk of Vascular Complications: The DOLCE Study From Northern Ukraine.

Olena Fedotkina, Oksana Sulaieva, Turkuler Ozgumus, Liubov Cherviakova, Nadiya Khalimon, Tetiana Svietleisha, Tetiana Buldenko, Emma Ahlqvist, Olof Asplund, Leif Groop and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Precision Medicine in Diabetes.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Olena FedotkinaDepartment of Clinical Science, Center for Diabetes Research, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Oksana SulaievaLund University Diabetes Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Turkuler OzgumusDepartment of Clinical Science, Center for Diabetes Research, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Liubov CherviakovaChernihiv Regional Hospital, Chernihiv, Ukraine.
Nadiya KhalimonCity Hospital Mo. 2, Chernihiv, Ukraine.
Tetiana SvietleishaCity Hospital No., Chernihiv, Ukraine.
Tetiana BuldenkoDepartment of Health Care of Chernihiv Regional State Administration, Chernihiv, Ukraine.
Emma AhlqvistLund University Diabetes Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Olof AsplundLund University Diabetes Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Leif GroopLund University Diabetes Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Peter M NilssonLund University Diabetes Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Valeriya LyssenkoDepartment of Clinical Science, Center for Diabetes Research, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Lund University · SESkåne University Hospital · SEChernihiv Polytechnic National University · UAUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPresently, persons with diabetes are classified as having type 1 (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) based on clinical diagnosis. However, adult patients exhibit diverse clinical representations and this makes treatment approaches challenging to personalize. A recent Scandinavian study proposed a novel classification of adult diabetes into five clusters based on disease pathophysiology and risk of vascular complications. The current study aimed to characterize new subgroups of adult diabetes using this strategy in a defined population from northern Ukraine.

methodsWe analyzed 2,140 patients with established diabetes from the DOLCE study (

resultsSevere autoimmune diabetes (SAID, 11 and 6%) and severe insulin-deficient diabetes (SIDD, 25 and 14%) clusters were twice as prevalent in patients with long-term as compared to those with new-onset diabetes. Patients with long duration in both SAID and SIDD clusters had highest risks of proliferative retinopathy, and elevated risks of CKD. Long-term insulin-resistant obese diabetes 1 (IROD1) subgroup had elevated risks of CKD, while insulin-resistant obese diabetes 2 (IROD2) cluster exhibited the highest HOMA2-B, lowest HbA

conclusionThe novel reclassification algorithm of patients with adult diabetes was reproducible in this population from northern Ukraine. It may be beneficial for the patients in the SIDD subgroup to initiate earlier insulin treatment or other anti-diabetic modalities to preserve β-cell function. Long-term diabetes cases with preserved β-cell function and lower risk for microvascular complications represent an interesting subgroup of patients for further investigations of protective mechanisms.

Indexed as

adult diabetesclusteringdiabetes complicationsgeneticsβ-cell function

Identifiers

PMID34276762
PMCPMC8283002
OpenAlexW3186200624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.