Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34276721›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in plant science2021

Optimizing Genomic-Enabled Prediction in Small-Scale Maize Hybrid Breeding Programs: A Roadmap Review.

Roberto Fritsche-Neto, Giovanni Galli, Karina Lima Reis Borges, Germano Costa-Neto, Filipe Couto Alves, Felipe Sabadin, Danilo Hottis Lyra, Pedro Patric Pinho Morais, Luciano Rogério Braatz de Andrade, Italo Granato and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Roberto Fritsche-NetoLaboratory of Allogamous Plant Breeding, Genetics Department, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil.
Giovanni GalliLaboratory of Allogamous Plant Breeding, Genetics Department, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil.
Karina Lima Reis BorgesLaboratory of Allogamous Plant Breeding, Genetics Department, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil.
Germano Costa-NetoLaboratory of Allogamous Plant Breeding, Genetics Department, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil.
Filipe Couto AlvesDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Felipe SabadinLaboratory of Allogamous Plant Breeding, Genetics Department, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil.
Danilo Hottis LyraDepartment of Computational and Analytical Sciences, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, United Kingdom.
Pedro Patric Pinho MoraisDepartment of Agronomy, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.
Luciano Rogério Braatz de AndradeBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA), Cassava and Fruits, Cruz das Almas, Brazil.
Italo GranatoLaboratoire d'Ecophysiologie des Plantes sous Stress Environnementaux (LEPSE), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Univ. Montpellier, SupAgro, Montpellier, France.
Jose CrossaBiometrics and Statistics Unit, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Carretera México - Veracruz, Texcoco, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The usefulness of genomic prediction (GP) for many animal and plant breeding programs has been highlighted for many studies in the last 20 years. In maize breeding programs, mostly dedicated to delivering more highly adapted and productive hybrids, this approach has been proved successful for both large- and small-scale breeding programs worldwide. Here, we present some of the strategies developed to improve the accuracy of GP in tropical maize, focusing on its use under low budget and small-scale conditions achieved for most of the hybrid breeding programs in developing countries. We highlight the most important outcomes obtained by the University of São Paulo (USP, Brazil) and how they can improve the accuracy of prediction in tropical maize hybrids. Our roadmap starts with the efforts for germplasm characterization, moving on to the practices for mating design, and the selection of the genotypes that are used to compose the training population in field phenotyping trials. Factors including population structure and the importance of non-additive effects (dominance and epistasis) controlling the desired trait are also outlined. Finally, we explain how the source of the molecular markers, environmental, and the modeling of genotype-environment interaction can affect the accuracy of GP. Results of 7 years of research in a public maize hybrid breeding program under tropical conditions are discussed, and with the great advances that have been made, we find that what is yet to come is exciting. The use of open-source software for the quality control of molecular markers, implementing GP, and envirotyping pipelines may reduce costs in an efficient computational manner. We conclude that exploring new models/tools using high-throughput phenotyping data along with large-scale envirotyping may bring more resolution and realism when predicting genotype performances. Despite the initial costs, mostly for genotyping, the GP platforms in combination with these other data sources can be a cost-effective approach for predicting the performance of maize hybrids for a large set of growing conditions.

Indexed as

accuracybreeding schemesgenomic selectionquantitative genomicsR packages

Identifiers

PMID34276721
PMCPMC8281958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.