Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34276690›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2021

Tumor-Associated Tertiary Lymphoid Structures: From Basic and Clinical Knowledge to Therapeutic Manipulation.

Charlotte Domblides, Juliette Rochefort, Clémence Riffard, Marylou Panouillot, Géraldine Lescaille, Jean-Luc Teillaud, Véronique Mateo, Marie-Caroline Dieu-Nosjean

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. A tumor-binding antibody with cross-reactivity to viral antigens.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Charlotte DomblidesFaculté de Médecine Sorbonne Université, Sorbonne Université, UMRS 1135, Paris, France.
Juliette RochefortFaculté de Médecine Sorbonne Université, Sorbonne Université, UMRS 1135, Paris, France.
Clémence RiffardFaculté de Médecine Sorbonne Université, Sorbonne Université, UMRS 1135, Paris, France.
Marylou PanouillotFaculté de Médecine Sorbonne Université, Sorbonne Université, UMRS 1135, Paris, France.
Géraldine LescailleFaculté de Médecine Sorbonne Université, Sorbonne Université, UMRS 1135, Paris, France.
Jean-Luc TeillaudFaculté de Médecine Sorbonne Université, Sorbonne Université, UMRS 1135, Paris, France.
Véronique MateoFaculté de Médecine Sorbonne Université, Sorbonne Université, UMRS 1135, Paris, France.
Marie-Caroline Dieu-NosjeanFaculté de Médecine Sorbonne Université, Sorbonne Université, UMRS 1135, Paris, France.
Inserm · FRSorbonne Université · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tumor microenvironment is a complex ecosystem almost unique to each patient. Most of available therapies target tumor cells according to their molecular characteristics, angiogenesis or immune cells involved in tumor immune-surveillance. Unfortunately, only a limited number of patients benefit in the long-term of these treatments that are often associated with relapses, in spite of the remarkable progress obtained with the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICP). The presence of "hot" tumors is a determining parameter for selecting therapies targeting the patient immunity, even though some of them still do not respond to treatment. In human studies, an in-depth analysis of the organization and interactions of tumor-infiltrating immune cells has revealed the presence of an ectopic lymphoid organization termed tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) in a large number of tumors. Their marked similarity to secondary lymphoid organs has suggested that TLS are an "anti-tumor school" and an "antibody factory" to fight malignant cells. They are effectively associated with long-term survival in most solid tumors, and their presence has been recently shown to predict response to ICP inhibitors. This review discusses the relationship between TLS and the molecular characteristics of tumors and the presence of oncogenic viruses, as well as their role when targeted therapies are used. Also, we present some aspects of TLS biology in non-tumor inflammatory diseases and discuss the putative common characteristics that they share with tumor-associated TLS. A detailed overview of the different pre-clinical models available to investigate TLS function and neogenesis is also presented. Finally, new approaches aimed at a better understanding of the role and function of TLS such as the use of spheroids and organoids and of artificial intelligence algorithms, are also discussed. In conclusion, increasing our knowledge on TLS will undoubtedly improve prognostic prediction and treatment selection in cancer patients with key consequences for the next generation immunotherapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansNeoplasmsTertiary Lymphoid StructuresTumor Microenvironmentartificial intelligencebiomarkercancerlymphoid neogenesisorganoidtertiary lymphoid structuretherapeutic interventiontumor model

Identifiers

PMID34276690
PMCPMC8279885
OpenAlexW3174580663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.