Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34276628›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2021

Bioinformatic Analysis of the

Luca Robinson, Janie Liaw, Zahra Omole, Dong Xia, Arnoud H M van Vliet, Nicolae Corcionivoschi, Abderrahman Hachani, Ozan Gundogdu

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genomic epidemiology and genetic characteristics of clinicalAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
  4. Microorganisms · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Whole-genome-based characterization ofMicrobial genomics · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Microbial genomics · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Luca RobinsonFaculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Janie LiawFaculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Zahra OmoleFaculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Dong XiaComparative Biomedical Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, London, United Kingdom.
Arnoud H M van VlietSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
Nicolae CorcionivoschiBacteriology Branch, Veterinary Sciences Division, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Abderrahman HachaniThe Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Ozan GundogduFaculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBAgri Food and Biosciences Institute · GBRoyal Veterinary College · GBUniversity of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Surrey · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Type VI Secretion System (T6SS) has important roles relating to bacterial antagonism, subversion of host cells, and niche colonisation.

Indexed as

Campylobacter jejunipathogenicity islandT6SS effectorsT6SS immunity proteinstoxin-antitoxinType VI Secretion System

Identifiers

PMID34276628
PMCPMC8285248
OpenAlexW3174144939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.