Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34276459›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021

Component Processes of Decision Making in a Community Sample of Precariously Housed Persons: Associations With Learning and Memory, and Health-Risk Behaviors.

Heather A Baitz, Paul W Jones, David A Campbell, Andrea A Jones, Kristina M Gicas, Chantelle J Giesbrecht, Wendy Loken Thornton, Carmelina C Barone, Nena Y Wang, William J Panenka and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Heather A BaitzDepartment of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Paul W JonesDepartment of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
David A CampbellDepartment of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Andrea A JonesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Kristina M GicasDepartment of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Chantelle J GiesbrechtDepartment of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Wendy Loken ThorntonDepartment of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Carmelina C BaroneDepartment of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Nena Y WangDepartment of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
William J PanenkaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Donna J LangBritish Columbia Mental Health and Substance Use Services, Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Fidel Vila-RodriguezDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Olga LeonovaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Alasdair M BarrBritish Columbia Mental Health and Substance Use Services, Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Ric M ProcyshynDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Tari BuchananDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Alexander RauscherDepartment of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
G William MacEwanDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
William G HonerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Allen E ThorntonDepartment of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CABC Mental Health & Substance Use Services · CASimon Fraser University · CACarleton University · CAYork University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) is a widely used measure of decision making, but its value in signifying behaviors associated with adverse, "real-world" consequences has not been consistently demonstrated in persons who are precariously housed or homeless. Studies evaluating the ecological validity of the IGT have primarily relied on traditional IGT scores. However, computational modeling derives underlying component processes of the IGT, which capture specific facets of decision making that may be more closely related to engagement in behaviors associated with negative consequences. This study employed the Prospect Valence Learning (PVL) model to decompose IGT performance into component processes in 294 precariously housed community residents with substance use disorders. Results revealed a predominant focus on gains and a lack of sensitivity to losses in these vulnerable community residents. Hypothesized associations were not detected between component processes and self-reported health-risk behaviors. These findings provide insight into the processes underlying decision making in a vulnerable substance-using population and highlight the challenge of linking specific decision making processes to "real-world" behaviors.

Indexed as

decision makinghealth riskhomelessness and housingIowa Gambling Taskmarginalizationprecariously housedprospect valence learning modelsubstance use

Identifiers

PMID34276459
PMCPMC8285095
OpenAlexW3180829377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.