Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34276451›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2021

Patients' Views With Regard to Personal Recovery in Forensic Psychiatry in German-Speaking Switzerland-An Explorative Study.

Susanne Schoppmann, Joachim Balensiefen, Steffen Lau, Marc Graf, Henning Hachtel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. I'm Not That Person: A Qualitative Study of Moral Injury in Forensic Psychiatric Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Susanne SchoppmannDepartement Education, Research and Practice Development, Universitäre Psychiatrische Kliniken Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Joachim BalensiefenDepartement Education, Research and Practice Development, Universitäre Psychiatrische Kliniken Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Steffen LauDepartment of Forensic Psychiatry, University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Marc GrafForensic Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universitäre Psychiatrische Kliniken Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Henning HachtelForensic Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universitäre Psychiatrische Kliniken Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recovery orientation (RO) is a modality of supporting patients to improve self-determination, leading a meaningful life and well-being in general. This approach is widely studied in general psychiatry, but evidence is lacking for forensic inpatient settings in Switzerland. While secure forensic clinics tend to be regarded as total institutions, which are an anathema to RO, a project to implement RO interventions in this setting was financed by the Swiss Federal Office of Justice. This explorative study investigates baseline expectations and views of patients in forensic wards in German-speaking Switzerland in the context of a recovery-oriented intervention. As such wards are non-existent in Latin-speaking Switzerland, the investigation could only be carried out in this language region. Six focus groups with 37 forensic inpatients were conducted. Thematic analysis revealed two major and several subthemes. The major theme "heteronomy" includes the subthemes "stigmatization and shame," "coercion," "lack of support," "mistrust," "waiting," and "structural impediments." The subthemes "learning to live with the disorder and working on oneself," "participation," "connectedness," "confidence," and "joie de vivre" belong to the major theme "regaining self-determination." In this way, results of prior research are extended to forensic peculiarities. Furthermore, the personal views of patients are discussed in detail regarding their possible influence on therapeutic outcomes and personal recovery. These findings should be of help to therapeutic staff in the respective setting to be better informed about, and to counter the effects of, heteronomy and long-term hospitalization. Important in this regard is the concept of procedural justice and the subjective client's perception thereof.

Indexed as

attitudesfocus groupsforensic inpatient psychiatryheteronomypersonal recoveryprocedural justiceself-determination

Identifiers

PMID34276451
PMCPMC8281199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.