ReviewNotfall & rettungsmedizin2021
[Quality indicators and structural requirements for Cardiac Arrest Centers-Update 2021].
Review in Notfall & rettungsmedizin, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Pathophysiology of postcardiac arrest syndrome].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026Review
- Effect of Cardiac Arrest Center Protocol Implementation on Survival After Nontraumatic Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- CT imaging in post-resuscitation care of non-traumatic resuscitation room patients in German hospitals.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
- A potentially lifesaving error: unintentional high-dose adrenaline administration in anaphylaxis-induced cardiac arrest; a case report.International journal of emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Improving survival after cardiac arrest in Europe: The synergetic effect of rescue chain strategies.Resuscitation plus · 2024Review
- Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2023Review
- [Cardiac arrest centers-certification fosters inflow of patients by emergency medical services].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2023Article
- Reply to the Letter to the Editor, regarding the article "German Cardiac Arrest Registry: rationale and design of G-CAR".Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2023Article
- [The new 2021 resuscitation guidelines and the importance of lay resuscitation].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2022Review
- [Guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) on cardiopulmonary resuscitation 2021: update and comments].Der Anaesthesist · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An update of the first description of quality indicators and structural requirements for Cardiac Arrest Centers from 2017 based on first experiences and certifications is presented. Criteria were adjusted, substantiated and in some parts redefined for feasibility in everyday clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.