Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34276196›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterology

The rise of proximal colorectal cancer: a trend analysis of subsite specific primary colorectal cancer in the SEER database.

Micheal Tadros, Sheena Mago, David Miller, Jane A Ungemack, Joseph C Anderson, Helen Swede

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Practical considerations for colorectal cancer screening in older adults.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022
    Review
  4. Post-Acquisition HyperpolarizedDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Micheal TadrosDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York (Micheal Tadros, David Miller).
Sheena MagoDepartment of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut (Sheena Mago).
David MillerDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York (Micheal Tadros, David Miller).
Jane A UngemackCommunity Medicine and Health Care, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut (Jane A Ungemack, Helen Swede).
Joseph C AndersonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire (Joseph C. Anderson), USA.
Helen SwedeCommunity Medicine and Health Care, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut (Jane A Ungemack, Helen Swede).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Given the significant prevalence of CRC, regular preventative screening is required. CRCs in different locations of the colon have variable molecular pathogenesis, gross appearance, and general disease outcomes. While the overall incidence of CRC has been decreasing, the decrease in proximally located CRC significantly lags behind the other forms of CRC. The objective of this study was to establish independent risk factors for proximal CRC for better identification of populations at risk for closer CRC monitoring and observation.

methodsA time-trend analysis was conducted using data from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 1973-2007, comparing patient characteristics (age, sex, race/ethnicity, year of diagnosis, age of diagnosis, tumor grade, tumor stage, and urban-rural setting) between CRCs originating in different locations.

resultsAnalysis demonstrated that black race, female sex, age over 60, and being diagnosed in the 21st century (rather than 20th) were associated with an increased risk of proximal CRC compared to CRCs originating in other locations.

conclusionsOur study showed that black race, female sex, and age over 60 independently increased the likelihood of proximal CRC diagnosis. Furthermore, CRC trends identify an increasing proportion of all CRCs being of proximal origin. It is imperative that patients undergo regularly scheduled complete colonoscopies by trained endoscopists, especially if they belong to the high-risk groups previously identified.

Indexed as

Colorectal cancercolorectal risk factorsproximal colorectal cancerSEER data set

Identifiers

PMID34276196
PMCPMC8276357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.