Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34276063›Full record

ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2021

Recurrent Spontaneous Miscarriage: a Comparison of International Guidelines.

Kilian Vomstein, Anna Aulitzky, Laura Strobel, Michael Bohlmann, Katharina Feil, Sabine Rudnik-Schöneborn, Johannes Zschocke, Bettina Toth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Treatment of septate uterus.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kilian VomsteinMedical University Innsbruck, Department of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria.
Anna AulitzkyMedical University Innsbruck, Department of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria.
Laura StrobelMedical University Innsbruck, Department of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria.
Michael BohlmannZentrum für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, St Elisabethen-Krankenhaus Lörrach gGmbH, Lörrach, Germany.
Katharina FeilMedical University Innsbruck, Department of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria.
Sabine Rudnik-SchönebornZentrum für medizinische Genetik, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Johannes ZschockeZentrum für medizinische Genetik, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Bettina TothMedical University Innsbruck, Department of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While roughly 30% of all women experience a spontaneous miscarriage in their lifetime, the incidence of recurrent (habitual) spontaneous miscarriage is 1 - 3% depending on the employed definition. The established risk factors include endocrine, anatomical, infection-related, genetic, haemostasis-related and immunological factors. Diagnosis is made more difficult by the sometimes diverging recommendations of the respective international specialist societies. The present study is therefore intended to provide a comparison of existing international guidelines and recommendations. The guidelines of the ESHRE, ASRM, the DGGG/OEGGG/SGGG and the recommendations of the RCOG were analysed. It was shown that investigation is indicated after 2 clinical pregnancies and the diagnosis should be made using a standardised timetable that includes the most frequent causes of spontaneous miscarriage. The guidelines concur that anatomical malformations, antiphospholipid syndrome and thyroid dysfunction should be excluded. Moreover, the guidelines recommend carrying out pre-conception chromosomal analysis of both partners (or of the aborted material). Other risk factors have not been included in the recommendations by all specialist societies, on the one hand because of a lack of diagnostic criteria (luteal phase insufficiency) and on the other hand because of the different age of the guidelines (chronic endometritis). In addition, various economic and consensus aspects in producing the guidelines influence the individual recommendations. An understanding of the underlying decision-making process should lead in practice to the best individual diagnosis and resulting treatment being offered to each couple.

Indexed as

geneticsinfertilitymiscarriage

Identifiers

PMID34276063
PMCPMC8277441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.