Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34276057›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2021

Prioritization of disease genes from GWAS using ensemble-based positive-unlabeled learning.

Nikita Kolosov, Mark J Daly, Mykyta Artomov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genome-scale perturbation signatures from primary human CD4bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Scientific Basics of Personalized Medicine: Realities and Opportunities.Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nikita KolosovITMO University, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Mark J DalyBroad Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA. mjdaly@atgu.mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0949-8752
Mykyta ArtomovITMO University, St. Petersburg, Russia. artomov@broadinstitute.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5282-8764

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A primary challenge in understanding disease biology from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) arises from the inability to directly implicate causal genes from association data. Integration of multiple-omics data sources potentially provides important functional links between associated variants and candidate genes. Machine-learning is well-positioned to take advantage of a variety of such data and provide a solution for the prioritization of disease genes. Yet, classical positive-negative classifiers impose strong limitations on the gene prioritization procedure, such as a lack of reliable non-causal genes for training. Here, we developed a novel gene prioritization tool-Gene Prioritizer (GPrior). It is an ensemble of five positive-unlabeled bagging classifiers (Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, Decision Tree, Adaptive Boosting), that treats all genes of unknown relevance as an unlabeled set. GPrior selects an optimal composition of algorithms to tune the model for each specific phenotype. Altogether, GPrior fills an important niche of methods for GWAS data post-processing, significantly improving the ability to pinpoint disease genes compared to existing solutions.

Indexed as

Machine LearningGenetic Diseases, InbornGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansQuantitative Trait Loci

Identifiers

PMID34276057
PMCPMC8484264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.