Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34275509›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2021

Readmission after discharge from acute mental healthcare among 231 988 people in England: cohort study exploring predictors of readmission including availability of acute day units in local areas.

David P J Osborn, Graziella Favarato, Danielle Lamb, Terri Harper, Sonia Johnson, Brynmor Lloyd-Evans, Louise Marston, Vanessa Pinfold, Deb Smith, James B Kirkbride and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A qualitative exploration of older people's experience of discharge from mental health inpatient settings.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

David P J OsbornDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, and Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2519-1539
Graziella FavaratoDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, UK.
Danielle LambDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1526-9793
Terri HarperDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, UK.
Sonia JohnsonDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, and Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Brynmor Lloyd-EvansDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9866-788X
Louise MarstonDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, UK.
Vanessa PinfoldMcPin Foundation, London, UK.
Deb SmithMcPin Foundation, London, UK.
James B KirkbrideDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3401-0824
Scott WeichMental Health Research Unit, Sheffield University, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the UK, acute mental healthcare is provided by in-patient wards and crisis resolution teams. Readmission to acute care following discharge is common. Acute day units (ADUs) are also provided in some areas.

aimsTo assess predictors of readmission to acute mental healthcare following discharge in England, including availability of ADUs.

methodWe enrolled a national cohort of adults discharged from acute mental healthcare in the English National Health Service (NHS) between 2013 and 2015, determined the risk of readmission to either in-patient or crisis teams, and used multivariable, multilevel logistic models to evaluate predictors of readmission.

resultsOf a total of 231 998 eligible individuals discharged from acute mental healthcare, 49 547 (21.4%) were readmitted within 6 months, with a median time to readmission of 34 days (interquartile range 10-88 days). Most variation in readmission (98%) was attributable to individual patient-level rather than provider (trust)-level effects (2.0%). Risk of readmission was not associated with local availability of ADUs (adjusted odds ratio 0.96, 95% CI 0.80-1.15). Statistically significant elevated risks were identified for participants who were female, older, single, from Black or mixed ethnic groups, or from more deprived areas. Clinical predictors included shorter index admission, psychosis and being an in-patient at baseline.

conclusionsRelapse and readmission to acute mental healthcare are common following discharge and occur early. Readmission was not influenced significantly by trust-level variables including availability of ADUs. More support for relapse prevention and symptom management may be required following discharge from acute mental healthcare.

Indexed as

community mental health teamsepidemiologyIn-patient treatmentpsychotic disorderssocial deprivation

Identifiers

PMID34275509
PMCPMC8329766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.