Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34275493›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroinflammation2021

Activation of GPR40 attenuates neuroinflammation and improves neurological function via PAK4/CREB/KDM6B pathway in an experimental GMH rat model.

Jie Xiao, Tao Cai, Yuanjian Fang, Rui Liu, Jerry J Flores, Wenna Wang, Ling Gao, Yu Liu, Qin Lu, Lihui Tang and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroinflammation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jie XiaoDepartment of Emergency, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 138 Tongzipo Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410013, People's Republic of China.
Tao CaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 138 Tongzipo Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410013, People's Republic of China.
Yuanjian FangDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California, 92354, USA.
Rui LiuDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California, 92354, USA.
Jerry J FloresDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California, 92354, USA.
Wenna WangDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California, 92354, USA.
Ling GaoDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California, 92354, USA.
Yu LiuDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California, 92354, USA.
Qin LuDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California, 92354, USA.
Lihui TangDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California, 92354, USA.
John H ZhangDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California, 92354, USA.
Hongwei LuCenter for Experimental Medicine, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 138 Tongzipo Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410013, People's Republic of China. hongweilu@csu.edu.cn.
Jiping TangDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California, 92354, USA. jtang@llu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2392-9280
Loma Linda University · USCentral South University · CN

Funding

Cerebrospinal Fluid Dynamics in Posthemorrhagic Hydrocephalus in NeonatesR01NS103822 · NINDS · LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY · PI ZHANG, JOHN H · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS103822
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGerminal matrix hemorrhage (GMH) is defined by the rupture of immature blood vessels in the germinal matrix, where subsequent hemorrhage enters the subependymal zone and the cerebral lateral ventricles. The consequent blood clot has been identified as the causative factor of secondary brain injury, which triggers a series of complex parallel and sequential harmful mechanisms, including neuroinflammation. The orphan G-protein-coupled receptor 40 (GPR40), a free fatty acid (FFA) receptor 1, has been shown to exert anti-inflammatory effects when activated and improved outcomes in animal models of stroke. We aimed to investigate the anti-inflammatory effects of GPR40 and its underlying mechanisms after GMH.

methodsGMH model was induced in 7-day-old rat pups by an intraparenchymal injection of bacterial collagenase. GPR40 agonist, GW9508, was administered intranasally 1 h, 25 h, and 49 h after GMH induction. CRISPR targeting GPR40, PAK4, and KDM6B were administered through intracerebroventricular injection 48 h before GMH induction. Neurologic scores, microglia polarization, and brain morphology were evaluated by negative geotaxis, right reflex, rotarod test, foot fault test, Morris water maze, immunofluorescence staining, Western blots, and nissl staining respectfully.

resultsThe results demonstrated that GW9508 improved neurological and morphological outcomes after GMH in the short (24 h, 48 h, 72h) and long-term (days 21-27). However, the neuroprotective effects of treatment were abolished by GW1100, a selective GPR40 antagonist. GW9508 treatment increased populations of M2 microglia and decreased M1 microglia in periventricular areas 24 h after GMH induction. GW9508 upregulated the phosphorylation of PAK4, CREB, and protein level of KDM6B, CD206, IL-10, which was also met with the downregulation of inflammatory markers IL-1β and TNF-α. The mechanism study demonstrated that the knockdown of GPR40, PAK4, and KDM6B reversed the neuroprotective effects brought on by GW9508. This evidence suggests that GPR40/PAK4/CREB/KDM6B signaling pathway in microglia plays a role in the attenuation of neuroinflammation after GMH.

conclusionsIn conclusion, the present study demonstrates that the activation of GPR40 attenuated GMH-induced neuroinflammation through the activation of the PAK4/CREB/KDM6B signaling pathway, and M2 microglia may be a major mediator of this effect. Thus, GPR40 may serve as a potential target in the reduction of the inflammatory response following GMH, thereby improving neurological outcomes in the short- and long-term.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornBehavior Rating ScaleCerebral HemorrhageCytokinesDisease Models, AnimalFluorescent Antibody TechniqueJumonji Domain-Containing Histone DemethylasesMicrogliaNeuroinflammatory DiseasesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSignal TransductionCytokinesG-protein-coupled receptor 40, ratJumonji Domain-Containing Histone DemethylasesKdm6b protein, ratReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledGerminal matrix hemorrhageGPR40MicrogliaNeuroinflammation

Identifiers

PMID34275493
PMCPMC8286626
OpenAlexW3186761562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.