Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34275466›Full record

ArticleItalian journal of pediatrics2021

Brief comments on three existing approaches for managing neonates at risk of early-onset sepsis.

E Vaccina, A Luglio, M Ceccoli, M Lecis, F Leone, T Zini, G Toni, L Lugli, L Lucaccioni, L Iughetti and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Predicting the likelihood of lower respiratory tractArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E VaccinaPost Graduate School of Paediatrics, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of the Mothers, Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy.
A LuglioPost Graduate School of Paediatrics, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of the Mothers, Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy.
M CeccoliPost Graduate School of Paediatrics, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of the Mothers, Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy.
M LecisPost Graduate School of Paediatrics, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of the Mothers, Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy.
F LeonePost Graduate School of Paediatrics, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of the Mothers, Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy.
T ZiniPost Graduate School of Paediatrics, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of the Mothers, Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy.
G ToniPost Graduate School of Paediatrics, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of the Mothers, Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy.
L LugliNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of the Mothers, Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy.
L LucaccioniPediatric Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of the Mothers, Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy.
L IughettiPediatric Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of the Mothers, Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy.
A BerardiNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of the Mothers, Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy. alberto.berardi@unimore.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3534-7499
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGrowing concerns regarding the adverse effects of antibiotics during the first days of life and the marked reduction in the incidence of early-onset sepsis (EOS) are changing the clinical practice for managing neonates at risk of EOS. Strategies avoiding unnecessary antibiotics while promoting mother-infant bonding and breastfeeding deserve to be considered. MAIN BODY: We compare strategies for managing newborns at risk of EOS recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics, which are among the most followed recommendations worldwide. Currently three different approaches are suggested in asymptomatic full-term or late preterm neonates: i) the conventional management, based on standard perinatal risk factors for EOS alone, ii) the neonatal sepsis calculator, a multivariate risk assessment based on individualized, quantitative risk estimates (relying on maternal risk factors for EOS) combined with physical examination findings at birth and in the following hours and iii) an approach entirely based on newborn clinical condition (serial clinical observation) during the first 48 h of life. We discuss advantages and limitations of these approaches, by analyzing studies supporting each strategy. Approximately 40% of infants who develop EOS cannot be identified on the basis of maternal RFs or laboratory tests, therefore close monitoring of the asymptomatic but at-risk infant remains crucial. A key question is to know what proportion of babies with mild, unspecific symptoms at birth can be managed safely without giving antibiotics.

conclusionsBoth neonatal sepsis calculator and serial clinical observation may miss cases of EOS, and clinical vigilance for all neonates is essential There is a need to assess which symptoms at birth are more predictive of EOS, and therefore require immediate interventions, or symptoms that can be carefully reevaluated without necessarily treat immediately the neonate with antibiotics. Studies comparing strategies for managing neonates are recommended.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansInfant, NewbornNeonatal SepsisPhysical ExaminationRisk AssessmentAnti-Bacterial AgentsEarly-onset sepsisGroup B streptococcusIntrapartum antibiotic prophylaxisNeonatal Sepsis calculatorNewbornPreventionSerial clinical observation

Identifiers

PMID34275466
PMCPMC8286612
OpenAlexW3183368165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.