ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2021
Detection of microsleep states from the EEG: a comparison of feature reduction methods.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Effective relax acquisition: a novel approach to classify relaxed state in alpha band EEG-based transformation.Brain informatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microsleeps are brief lapses in consciousness with complete suspension of performance. They are the cause of fatal accidents in many transport sectors requiring sustained attention, especially driving. A microsleep-warning device, using wireless EEG electrodes, could be used to rouse a user from an imminent microsleep. High-dimensional datasets, especially in EEG-based classification, present challenges as there are often a large number of potentially useful features for detecting the phenomenon of interest. Thus, it is often important to reduce the dimension of the original data prior to training the classifier. In this study, linear dimensionality reduction methods-principal component analysis (PCA) and probabilistic PCA (PPCA)-were compared with eight non-linear dimensionality reduction methods (kernel PCA, classical multi-dimensional scaling, isometric mapping, nearest neighbour estimation, stochastic neighbourhood embedding, autoencoder, stochastic proximity embedding, and Laplacian eigenmaps) on previously collected behavioural and EEG data from eight healthy non-sleep-deprived volunteers performing a 1D-visuomotor tracking task for 1 h. The effectiveness of the feature reduction algorithms was evaluated by visual inspection of class separation on 3D scatterplots, by trustworthiness scores, and by microsleep detection performance on a stacked-generalisation-based linear discriminant analysis (LDA) system estimating the microsleep/responsive state at 1 Hz based on the reduced features. On trustworthiness, PPCA outperformed PCA, but PCA outperformed all of the non-linear techniques. The trustworthiness score for each feature reduction method also correlated strongly with microsleep-state detection performance, providing strong validation of the ability of trustworthiness to estimate the relative effectiveness of feature reduction approaches, in terms of predicting performance, and ability to do so independently of the gold standard. Graphical abstract Proposed microsleep detection system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.