Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34275029›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology2021

Clinical aspects and prognosis of polymicrobial keratitis caused by different microbial combinations: a retrospective comparative case study.

Ibrahim Inan Harbiyeli, Oguzhan Oruz, Elif Erdem, Burcu Cam, Mehtap Demirkazik, Arbil Acikalin, Filiz Kibar, Macit Ilkit, Fugen Yarkin, Meltem Yagmur

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Anti-Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Activity ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Rare Case of Endophthalmitis withAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ibrahim Inan HarbiyeliSchool of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey. inanharbiyeli@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2586-1096
Oguzhan OruzDepartment of Ophthalmology, Muradiye State Hospital, Van, Turkey.
Elif ErdemSchool of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
Burcu CamSchool of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
Mehtap DemirkazikSchool of Medicine, Department of Parasitology, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
Arbil AcikalinSchool of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
Filiz KibarSchool of Medicine, Department of Medical Microbiology, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
Macit IlkitSchool of Medicine, Department of Microbiology, Division of Mycology, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
Fugen YarkinSchool of Medicine, Department of Microbiology, Division of Virology, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
Meltem YagmurSchool of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
Cukurova University · TRSivas State Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study is to compare the predisposing factors, clinical findings, treatment results, and prognosis for polymicrobial keratitis.

methodsIn this retrospective comparative case study, we identified the cases of polymicrobial keratitis from the microbiological records (n = 649) at Balcalı Hospital, Çukurova University (Adana, Turkey; October 2010-2018). We included all the cases of infectious keratitis with two different types of microbial agents and grouped them as follows: group 1 (n = 25), bacterium-fungus coexistence; group 2 (n = 12), herpes simplex virus (HSV) or Acanthamoeba with bacterial infection; and group 3 (n = 7), HSV or Acanthamoeba with fungal infection. We compared the clinical and microbiological characteristics, and treatment outcomes among the groups.

resultsIn our study, we found that 44 infectious keratitis cases (6.7%) were of polymicrobial nature. The mean follow-up period was 11.4 ± 17.8 months. In total, 17 different bacteria along with 3 different fungi, HSV, and Acanthamoeba were isolated. The most common bacterium was Staphylococcus epidermidis (25%). Most of the fungal pathogens were filamentous. Patients with initial treatment failure and requiring surgical intervention had larger infiltrates (p = 0.023, p = 0.003, respectively) than other patients. Older age was associated with delayed recovery and poor visual prognosis.

conclusionsBacterial-fungus coexistence is the most common combination among patients, but other combinations should also be considered for suspected polymicrobial etiology. The corneal infiltrate size may be an important indicator of the course of disease and response to treatment. A closer and longer follow-up period should be planned for older patients.

Indexed as

Acanthamoeba KeratitisEye Infections, BacterialKeratitisAgedFungiHumansPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsStaphylococcus epidermidisAcanthamoebaAspergillusFusariumHerpes virusMicrobial pathogenPolymicrobial keratitis

Identifiers

PMID34275029
OpenAlexW3184059633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.