Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34274987›Full record

ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2022

The impact of donor and recipient sex on kidney allograft survival in pediatric transplant recipients.

Nadeesha L Mudalige, Chloe Brown, Stephen D Marks

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Influence of donor sex and age on graft outcome in kidney transplantation.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Why do we keep ignoring sex in kidney disease?Clinical kidney journal · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Sex as a biological variable: Mechanistic insights and clinical relevance in solid organ transplantation.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nadeesha L MudaligeNIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK. nadeesha.mudalige@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9459-5874
Chloe BrownNational Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK.
Stephen D MarksNIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9850-8352
Great Ormond Street Hospital · GBNational Health Service · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransplantation is widely considered the gold standard method of kidney replacement therapy. Despite compelling evidence for biological sexual dimorphisms, the role of donor and recipient sex matching in transplantation is undefined.

methodsThe UK historical cohort study explores the impact of donor and recipient sex on allograft survival, in children receiving their first deceased donor transplant. Nationwide registry data were collected for 1316 transplant procedures performed from January 1, 1999, to December 31, 2019.

resultsMale donor-male recipient transplantation occurred most frequently (35%), followed by female donor-male recipient (23%), male donor-female recipient (22%), and female donor-female recipient (20%). The median follow-up time was 7.03 years (IQR: 2.89-12.4 years), with a total of 10,326 person-years. Male donor-male recipients were associated with the highest 10-year kidney allograft survival (72.8% [95% CI 68.3-77.8]) and male donor-female recipients with the lowest (64% [95% CI 57.7-71.1]). Multivariable Cox regression demonstrated for male donor transplantation, the risk of kidney allograft failure was 1.46 times greater for female (compared to male) recipients, after adjusting for acquired recipient age, recipient/donor age at transplantation, mismatched HLA A/B/DR, waitlist time, cold ischemia time, CMV seropositivity, donor hypertension, and donor diabetes (HR 1.46 [95% CI. 1.06-2.01], p = 0.02). There was no evidence for an independent effect of donor or recipient sex in other combinations.

conclusionThis study highlights the complex relationship between donor and recipient sex and pediatric kidney allograft survival, which require further mechanistic evaluation.

Indexed as

Graft SurvivalKidney TransplantationTissue DonorsTransplant RecipientsAllograftsChildCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSex FactorsKidneyPediatricSexSurvivalTransplantation

Identifiers

PMID34274987
OpenAlexW3183308051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.