Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34274949›Full record

ReviewHorticulture research2021

Transgenic and genome-edited fruits: background, constraints, benefits, and commercial opportunities.

Maria Lobato-Gómez, Seanna Hewitt, Teresa Capell, Paul Christou, Amit Dhingra, Patricia Sarai Girón-Calva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Horticulture research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Pest risk assessment ofEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. CRISPR/Cas as a Genome-Editing Technique in Fruit Tree Breeding.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maria Lobato-GómezDepartment of Crop and Forest Sciences, University of Lleida-Agrotecnio CERCA Center, Lleida, 25198, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2589-6216
Seanna HewittDepartment of Horticulture, Washington State University, PO Box, 646414, Pullman, WA, USA.
Teresa CapellDepartment of Crop and Forest Sciences, University of Lleida-Agrotecnio CERCA Center, Lleida, 25198, Spain.
Paul ChristouDepartment of Crop and Forest Sciences, University of Lleida-Agrotecnio CERCA Center, Lleida, 25198, Spain.
Amit DhingraDepartment of Horticulture, Washington State University, PO Box, 646414, Pullman, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4464-2502
Patricia Sarai Girón-CalvaDepartment of Crop and Forest Sciences, University of Lleida-Agrotecnio CERCA Center, Lleida, 25198, Spain. sarai.giron@udl.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0166-8478

Funding

TRAINING IN BIOTECHNOLOGY: EMPHASIS ON PROTEIN CHEMISTRYT32GM008336 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CALL, DOUGLAS R. · 1989 to 2023
$8.9M
Generalitat de Catalunya (Government of Catalonia) Grant 2017 SGR 828NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008336Washington State University (WSU) WNP00011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breeding has been used successfully for many years in the fruit industry, giving rise to most of today's commercial fruit cultivars. More recently, new molecular breeding techniques have addressed some of the constraints of conventional breeding. However, the development and commercial introduction of such novel fruits has been slow and limited with only five genetically engineered fruits currently produced as commercial varieties-virus-resistant papaya and squash were commercialized 25 years ago, whereas insect-resistant eggplant, non-browning apple, and pink-fleshed pineapple have been approved for commercialization within the last 6 years and production continues to increase every year. Advances in molecular genetics, particularly the new wave of genome editing technologies, provide opportunities to develop new fruit cultivars more rapidly. Our review, emphasizes the socioeconomic impact of current commercial fruit cultivars developed by genetic engineering and the potential impact of genome editing on the development of improved cultivars at an accelerated rate.

Identifiers

PMID34274949
PMCPMC8286259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.