Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34274845›Full record

ArticleJournal of trace elements in medicine and biology : organ of the Society for Minerals and Trace Elements (GMS)2021

Evaluation of in vitro activity of copper gluconate against SARS-CoV-2 using confocal microscopy-based high content screening.

Killian Rodriguez, Florian Saunier, Josselin Rigaill, Estelle Audoux, Elisabeth Botelho-Nevers, Amélie Prier, Yann Dickerscheit, Sylvie Pillet, Bruno Pozzetto, Thomas Bourlet and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of trace elements in medicine and biology : organ of the Society for Minerals and Trace Elements (GMS), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Killian RodriguezCIRI, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, GIMAP team, University of Lyon, University of St-Etienne, INSERM U1111, CNRS UMR5308, ENS de Lyon, UCBL1, St-Etienne, France.
Florian SaunierCIRI, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, GIMAP team, University of Lyon, University of St-Etienne, INSERM U1111, CNRS UMR5308, ENS de Lyon, UCBL1, St-Etienne, France; Infectious Diseases Department, University Hospital of St-Etienne, France.
Josselin RigaillCIRI, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, GIMAP team, University of Lyon, University of St-Etienne, INSERM U1111, CNRS UMR5308, ENS de Lyon, UCBL1, St-Etienne, France; Department of Infectious Agents and Hygiene, University Hospital of St-Etienne, France.
Estelle AudouxCIRI, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, GIMAP team, University of Lyon, University of St-Etienne, INSERM U1111, CNRS UMR5308, ENS de Lyon, UCBL1, St-Etienne, France.
Elisabeth Botelho-NeversCIRI, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, GIMAP team, University of Lyon, University of St-Etienne, INSERM U1111, CNRS UMR5308, ENS de Lyon, UCBL1, St-Etienne, France; Infectious Diseases Department, University Hospital of St-Etienne, France.
Amélie PrierCIRI, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, GIMAP team, University of Lyon, University of St-Etienne, INSERM U1111, CNRS UMR5308, ENS de Lyon, UCBL1, St-Etienne, France.
Yann DickerscheitCIRI, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, GIMAP team, University of Lyon, University of St-Etienne, INSERM U1111, CNRS UMR5308, ENS de Lyon, UCBL1, St-Etienne, France.
Sylvie PilletCIRI, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, GIMAP team, University of Lyon, University of St-Etienne, INSERM U1111, CNRS UMR5308, ENS de Lyon, UCBL1, St-Etienne, France; Department of Infectious Agents and Hygiene, University Hospital of St-Etienne, France.
Bruno PozzettoCIRI, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, GIMAP team, University of Lyon, University of St-Etienne, INSERM U1111, CNRS UMR5308, ENS de Lyon, UCBL1, St-Etienne, France; Department of Infectious Agents and Hygiene, University Hospital of St-Etienne, France.
Thomas BourletCIRI, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, GIMAP team, University of Lyon, University of St-Etienne, INSERM U1111, CNRS UMR5308, ENS de Lyon, UCBL1, St-Etienne, France; Department of Infectious Agents and Hygiene, University Hospital of St-Etienne, France.
Paul O VerhoevenCIRI, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, GIMAP team, University of Lyon, University of St-Etienne, INSERM U1111, CNRS UMR5308, ENS de Lyon, UCBL1, St-Etienne, France; Department of Infectious Agents and Hygiene, University Hospital of St-Etienne, France. Electronic address: paul.verhoeven@univ-st-etienne.fr.
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextSevere Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that emerged late in 2019 is the etiologic agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). There is an urgent need to develop curative and preventive therapeutics to limit the current pandemic and to prevent the re-emergence of Covid-19. This study aimed to assess the in vitro activity of copper gluconate against SARS-CoV-2.

methodsVero E6 cells were cultured with or without copper gluconate 18-24 hours before infection. Cells were infected with a recombinant GFP expressing SARS-CoV-2. Cells were infected with a recombinant GFP expressing SARS-CoV-2. Infected cells were incubated in fresh medium containing varying concentration of copper gluconate (supplemented with bovine serum albumin or not) for an additional 48 -h period. The infection level was measured by the confocal microscopy-based high content screening method. The cell viability in presence of copper gluconate was assessed by XTT and propidium iodide assays.

resultsThe viability of Vero E6 cells exposed to copper gluconate up to 200 μM was found to be similar to that of unexposed cells, but it dropped below 70 % with 400 μM of this agent after 72 h of continuous exposure. The infection rate was 23.8 %, 18.9 %, 20.6 %, 6.9 %, 5.3 % and 5.2 % in cells treated prior infection with 0, 2, 10, 25, 50 and 100 μM of copper gluconate respectively. As compared to untreated cells, the number of infected cells was reduced by 71 %, 77 %, and 78 % with 25, 50, and 100 μM of copper gluconate respectively (p < 0.05). In cells treated only post-infection, the rate of infection dropped by 73 % with 100 μM of copper gluconate (p < 0.05). However, the antiviral activity of copper gluconate was abolished by the addition of bovine serum albumin.

conclusionCopper gluconate was found to mitigate SARS-CoV-2 infection in Vero E6 cells but this effect was abolished by albumin, which suggests that copper will not retain its activity in serum. Furthers studies are needed to investigate whether copper gluconate could be of benefit in mucosal administration such as mouthwash, nasal spray or aerosols.

Indexed as

Microscopy, ConfocalAnimalsAntiviral AgentsCell SurvivalChlorocebus aethiopsCOVID-19GluconatesGreen Fluorescent ProteinsSARS-CoV-2Vero CellsAntiviral AgentsGluconatesGreen Fluorescent ProteinsCopper gluconateSARS-CoV-2Vero E6 cells

Identifiers

PMID34274845
PMCPMC8264279
OpenAlexW3178369584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.