ArticleMedical image analysis2021
Joint hub identification for brain networks by multivariate graph inference.
Article in Medical image analysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Weighted network analysis of adverse outcome pathways decodes the multiscale mechanisms of environmental toxicity.Environmental science and ecotechnology · 2026Article
- Accelerating crop improvement via integration of transcriptome-based network biology and genome editing.Planta · 2025Review
- A comprehensive survey of complex brain network representation.Meta-radiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent developments in neuroimaging allow us to investigate the structural and functional connectivity between brain regions in vivo. Mounting evidence suggests that hub nodes play a central role in brain communication and neural integration. Such high centrality, however, makes hub nodes particularly susceptible to pathological network alterations and the identification of hub nodes from brain networks has attracted much attention in neuroimaging. Current popular hub identification methods often work in a univariate manner, i.e., selecting the hub nodes one after another based on either heuristic of the connectivity profile at each node or predefined settings of network modules. Since the topological information of the entire network (such as network modules) is not fully utilized, current methods have limited power to identify hubs that link multiple modules (connector hubs) and are biased toward identifying hubs having many connections within the same module (provincial hubs). To address this challenge, we propose a novel multivariate hub identification method. Our method identifies connector hubs as those that partition the network into disconnected components when they are removed from the network. Furthermore, we extend our hub identification method to find the population-based hub nodes from a group of network data. We have compared our hub identification method with existing methods on both simulated and human brain network data. Our proposed method achieves more accurate and replicable discovery of hub nodes and exhibits enhanced statistical power in identifying network alterations related to neurological disorders such as Alzheimer's disease and obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.