Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34274379›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2021

Intellectual awareness of naming abilities in people with chronic post-stroke aphasia.

Candace M van der Stelt, Mackenzie E Fama, Joshua D Mccall, Sarah F Snider, Peter E Turkeltaub

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Metacognition impairment in stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Candace M van der SteltCenter for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Georgetown University Medical Center, USA; Department of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, USA; Research Division, MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital, USA.
Mackenzie E FamaCenter for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Georgetown University Medical Center, USA; Department of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, USA; Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, George Washington University, USA.
Joshua D MccallCenter for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Georgetown University Medical Center, USA; Department of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, USA.
Sarah F SniderDepartment of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, USA.
Peter E TurkeltaubCenter for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Georgetown University Medical Center, USA; Department of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, USA; Research Division, MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital, USA. Electronic address: turkeltp@georgetown.edu.
Georgetown University · USMedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital · US

Funding

Contributions of spared brain structures and connections to aphasia recoveryR01DC014960 · NIDCD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI TURKELTAUB, PETER ETHAN · 2017 to 2021
$4.0M
Investigating insight into inner speech in aphasiaR03DC014310 · NIDCD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI TURKELTAUB, PETER ETHAN · 2015 to 2017
$462k
Using self-reported inner speech to guide treatment for anomiaF31DC014875 · NIDCD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI FAMA, MACKENZIE ELIZABETH · 2015 to 2017
$93k
NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC014875NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014960NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC014310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anosognosia, or lack of self-awareness, is often present following neurological injury and can result in poor functional outcomes. The specific phenomenon of intellectual awareness, the knowledge that a function is impaired in oneself, has not been widely studied in post-stroke aphasia. We aim to identify behavioral and neural correlates of intellectual awareness by comparing stroke survivors' self-reports of anomia to objective naming performance and examining lesion sites. Fifty-three participants with chronic aphasia without severe comprehension deficits rated their naming ability and completed a battery of behavioral tests. We calculated the reliability and accuracy of participant self-ratings, then examined the relationship of poor intellectual awareness to speech, language, and cognitive measures. We used support vector regression lesion-symptom mapping (SVR-LSM) to determine lesion locations associated with impaired and preserved intellectual awareness. Reliability and accuracy of self-ratings varied across the participants. Poor intellectual awareness was associated with reduced performance on tasks that rely on semantics. Our SVR-LSM results demonstrated that anterior inferior frontal lesions were associated with poor awareness, while mid-superior temporal lesions were associated with preserved awareness. An anterior-posterior gradient was evident in the unthresholded lesion-symptom maps. While many people with chronic aphasia and relatively intact comprehension can accurately and reliably report the severity of their anomia, others overestimate, underestimate, or inconsistently estimate their naming abilities. Clinicians should consider this when administering self-rating scales, particularly when semantic deficits or anterior inferior frontal lesions are present. Administering self-ratings on multiple days may be useful to check the reliability of patient perceptions.

Indexed as

AphasiaStrokeBrain MappingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingReproducibility of ResultsSemanticsAnomiaAnosognosiaAphasiaAwarenessSelf-ratingVoxel-based lesion symptom mapping

Identifiers

PMID34274379
PMCPMC8405585
OpenAlexW3184147240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.