Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34274018›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2021

Cellulosic biofuel production using emulsified simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (eSSF) with conventional and thermotolerant yeasts.

Shannon M Hoffman, Maria Alvarez, Gilad Alfassi, Dmitry M Rein, Sergio Garcia-Echauri, Yachin Cohen, José L Avalos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Development ofBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Engineering thermotolerant microbial strains viaEngineering microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Shannon M Hoffman *Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Hoyt Laboratory, Princeton University, 101 Hoyt Laboratory, William Street, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA.
Maria Alvarez *Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Hoyt Laboratory, Princeton University, 101 Hoyt Laboratory, William Street, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA.
Gilad AlfassiDepartment of Biotechnology Engineering, ORT Braude College, Karmiel, Israel.
Dmitry M ReinDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Sergio Garcia-EchauriDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Hoyt Laboratory, Princeton University, 101 Hoyt Laboratory, William Street, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA.
Yachin CohenDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
José L AvalosDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Hoyt Laboratory, Princeton University, 101 Hoyt Laboratory, William Street, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA. javalos@princeton.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7209-4208
Princeton University · USTechnion – Israel Institute of Technology · ILBraude College of Engineering Karmiel · IL

Funding

Directorate for Engineering CBET-1751840Israel Science Foundation 123/18Office of Science DE-SC0019363Xunta de Galicia and ERDF ED481B-2016/140-0 and ED481D-2019/017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFuture expansion of corn-derived ethanol raises concerns of sustainability and competition with the food industry. Therefore, cellulosic biofuels derived from agricultural waste and dedicated energy crops are necessary. To date, slow and incomplete saccharification as well as high enzyme costs have hindered the economic viability of cellulosic biofuels, and while approaches like simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) and the use of thermotolerant microorganisms can enhance production, further improvements are needed. Cellulosic emulsions have been shown to enhance saccharification by increasing enzyme contact with cellulose fibers. In this study, we use these emulsions to develop an emulsified SSF (eSSF) process for rapid and efficient cellulosic biofuel production and make a direct three-way comparison of ethanol production between S. cerevisiae, O. polymorpha, and K. marxianus in glucose and cellulosic media at different temperatures.

resultsIn this work, we show that cellulosic emulsions hydrolyze rapidly at temperatures tolerable to yeast, reaching up to 40-fold higher conversion in the first hour compared to microcrystalline cellulose (MCC). To evaluate suitable conditions for the eSSF process, we explored the upper temperature limits for the thermotolerant yeasts Kluyveromyces marxianus and Ogataea polymorpha, as well as Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and observed robust fermentation at up to 46, 50, and 42 °C for each yeast, respectively. We show that the eSSF process reaches high ethanol titers in short processing times, and produces close to theoretical yields at temperatures as low as 30 °C. Finally, we demonstrate the transferability of the eSSF technology to other products by producing the advanced biofuel isobutanol in a light-controlled eSSF using optogenetic regulators, resulting in up to fourfold higher titers relative to MCC SSF.

conclusionsThe eSSF process addresses the main challenges of cellulosic biofuel production by increasing saccharification rate at temperatures tolerable to yeast. The rapid hydrolysis of these emulsions at low temperatures permits fermentation using non-thermotolerant yeasts, short processing times, low enzyme loads, and makes it possible to extend the process to chemicals other than ethanol, such as isobutanol. This transferability establishes the eSSF process as a platform for the sustainable production of biofuels and chemicals as a whole.

Indexed as

BiofuelsBiomass pretreatmentCelluloseEmulsionsEthanolIsobutanolKluyveromyces marxianusOgataea polymorphaOptogeneticsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSSFThermotolerant

Identifiers

PMID34274018
PMCPMC8285809
OpenAlexW3185577435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.