Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34274013›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2021

Impact of cumulative fluid balance on the pharmacokinetics of extended infusion meropenem in critically ill patients with sepsis.

Renata Černá Pařízková, Jiřina Martínková, Eduard Havel, Petr Šafránek, Milan Kaška, David Astapenko, Jan Bezouška, Jaroslav Chládek, Vladimír Černý

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Renata Černá PařízkováDepartment of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Medicine, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové and University Hospital Hradec Králové, Sokolská 581, 50005, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Jiřina MartínkováDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Hradec Králové, Sokolská 581, 50005, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Eduard HavelDepartment of Surgery, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové and University Hospital Hradec Králové, Sokolská 581, 50005, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Petr ŠafránekDepartment of Surgery, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové and University Hospital Hradec Králové, Sokolská 581, 50005, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Milan KaškaDepartment of Surgery, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové and University Hospital Hradec Králové, Sokolská 581, 50005, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
David AstapenkoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Medicine, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové and University Hospital Hradec Králové, Sokolská 581, 50005, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Jan BezouškaDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Hradec Králové, Sokolská 581, 50005, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Jaroslav ChládekDepartment of Pharmacology, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Šimkova 870, 50003, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic. chladekj@lfhk.cuni.cz.ORCID 0000-0002-9052-6318
Vladimír ČernýDepartment of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Medicine, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové and University Hospital Hradec Králové, Sokolská 581, 50005, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Charles University · CZUniversity Hospital Hradec Králové · CZ

Funding

Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy PROGRES Q40/04Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky 15-31881AMinisterstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky NT14089-3/2013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeropenem dosing for septic critically patients is difficult due to pathophysiological changes associated with sepsis as well as supportive symptomatic therapies. A prospective single-center study assessed whether fluid retention alters meropenem pharmacokinetics and the achievement of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets for efficacy.

methodsTwenty-five septic ICU patients (19 m, 6f) aged 32-86 years with the mean APACHE II score of 20.2 (range 11-33), suffering mainly from perioperative intra-abdominal or respiratory infections and septic shock (n = 18), were investigated over three days after the start of extended 3-h i.v. infusions of meropenem q8h. Urinary creatinine clearance (CL

resultsEleven patients (9 with peritonitis) were classified as fluid overload (FO) based on a positive day 1 CFB of more than 10% body weight. Compared to NoFO patients (n = 14, 11 with pneumonia), the FO patients had a lower meropenem clearance (CL

conclusionsThese findings emphasize the importance of TDM and a cautious approach to augmented maintenance dosing of meropenem to patients with FO infected with less susceptible pathogens, if guided by population covariate relationships between CL

Indexed as

PharmacokineticsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsAPACHEBayes TheoremCritical IllnessCzech RepublicFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMeropenemMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsMeropenemCritically ill patientsFluid therapyMeropenemPharmacodynamicsPharmacokineticsSepsis

Identifiers

PMID34274013
PMCPMC8285835
OpenAlexW3186048918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.