Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34274004›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2021

The Clinical Sustainability Assessment Tool: measuring organizational capacity to promote sustainability in healthcare.

Sara Malone, Kim Prewitt, Rachel Hackett, John C Lin, Virginia McKay, Callie Walsh-Bailey, Douglas A Luke

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 100 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06003569 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Reducing Asthma Attacks in Disadvantaged School Children With Asthma

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2023 to 2027Enrolled300ConditionsAsthma in ChildrenArmsBACK-S, BACK-E
NCT07007039 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Remote Therapeutic Monitoring: Pilot Implementation-Effectiveness Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorShirley Ryan AbilityLabRan2025 to 2027Enrolled25ConditionsCancerArmsDatos Health App
NCT07372066 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Cognitive Stimulation Therapy Group for Residential Home Residents With Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment-- A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCity University of Hong KongRan2026 to 2026Enrolled110ConditionsCognitive FunctionsArmsCognitive Stimulation Therapy group, Calligraphy group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sara MaloneWashington University in St. Louis, Brown School, St. Louis, MO, USA. sara.malone@wustl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0361-8733
Kim PrewittWashington University in St. Louis, Brown School, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Rachel HackettWashington University in St. Louis, Brown School, St. Louis, MO, USA.
John C LinDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA.
Virginia McKayWashington University in St. Louis, Brown School, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Callie Walsh-BaileyWashington University in St. Louis, Brown School, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Douglas A LukeWashington University in St. Louis, Brown School, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
Washington University Center for Diabetes Translation Research P30DK092950 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Ross C Brownson, Debra Haire-Joshu · 2011 to 2026
$11.7M
Washington University Implementation Science Center for Cancer Control (WU-ISCCC)P50CA244431 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BROWNSON, ROSS C, COLDITZ, GRAHAM A. · 2019 to 2023
$8.0M
National Cancer Institute (US) P50CA244431National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (US) UL1TR002345NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NCI NIH HHS P50 CA244431NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew validated assessment tools are available to increase understanding and measure factors associated with sustainment of clinical practices, an increasingly recognized need among clinicians. We describe the development of the Clinical Sustainability Assessment Tool (CSAT), designed to assess factors that contribute to sustainable practices in clinical settings.

methodsSixty-four participants from clinical and research fields participated in concept mapping and were recruited to brainstorm factors that lead to sustained clinical practices. Once repeated factors were removed, participants sorted items based on similarity and rated them by importance and feasibility. Using concept mapping analyses, items were grouped into meaningful domains to develop an initial tool. We then recruited pilot sites and early adopters, for a total of 286 practicing clinicians, to pilot and evaluate the tool. Individuals were recruited from clinical settings across pediatric and adult medical and surgical subspecialties. The data were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to test hypothesized subscale structure in the instrument. We used root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) and the standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) to assess fit and thus the ability of CSAT to measure the identified domains.

resultsThe concept mapping produced sorted statements that were edited into items that could be responded to, resulting in the creation of a tool with seven determinant domains and 47 items. The pilot and CFA testing resulted in a final CSAT instrument made up 35 items, five per domain. CFA results demonstrated very good fit of the seven domain structure of the CSAT (RMSEA = 0.049; SRMR = 0.049). Usability testing indicated the CSAT is brief, easy to use, easy to learn, and does not require extensive training. Additionally, the measure scored highly (18/20) on the Psychometric and Pragmatic Evidence Rating Scale (PAPERS). The seven final CSAT domains were engaged staff and leadership, engaged stakeholders, organizational readiness, workflow integration, implementation and training, monitoring and evaluation, and outcomes and effectiveness.

conclusionsThe CSAT is a new reliable assessment tool which allows for greater practical and scientific understanding of contextual factors that enable sustainable clinical practices over time.

Indexed as

Clinical scienceHealthcareMeasurement developmentReliabilitySustainability

Identifiers

PMID34274004
PMCPMC8285819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.