Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34274003›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2021

Impact of Oncotype DX testing on ER+ breast cancer treatment and survival in the first decade of use.

Evelien Schaafsma, Baoyi Zhang, Merit Schaafsma, Chun-Yip Tong, Lanjing Zhang, Chao Cheng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Evelien Schaafsma *Department of Molecular and Systems Biology, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.
Baoyi Zhang *Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Merit SchaafsmaFaculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Chun-Yip TongDepartment of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Lanjing ZhangDepartment of Biological Sciences, Rutgers University Newark, Newark, NJ, USA.
Chao ChengDepartment of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. chao.cheng@bcm.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5002-3417
Dartmouth College · USBaylor College of Medicine · USRice University · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

IMMUNOBIOLOGY OF MYELOID AND LYMPHOID CELLST32AI007363 · NIAID · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Claudia V Jakubzick · 1990 to 2026
$9.5M
(PQD4) SIGNS OF INFLAMMATORY BREAST CANCER ARE CAUSED BY STROMAL FIELD EFFECTSR01CA180061 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI WOODWARD, WENDY A · 2013 to 2016
$1.9M
Computational Identification of new candidate drugs for lung cancer treatmentR21CA227996 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI CHENG, CHAO, ONEGA, TRACY · 2019 to 2020
$397k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA227996NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007363
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Oncotype DX breast recurrence score has been introduced more than a decade ago to aid physicians in determining the need for systemic adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early-stage, estrogen receptor (ER)+, lymph node-negative breast cancer.

methodsIn this study, we utilized data from The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program to investigate temporal trends in Oncotype DX usage among US breast cancer patients in the first decade after the introduction of the Oncotype DX assay.

resultsWe found that the use of Oncotype DX has steadily increased in the first decade of use and that this increase is associated with a decreased usage of chemotherapy. Patients who utilized the Oncotype DX test tended to have improved survival compared to patients who did not use the assay even after adjusting for clinical variables associated with prognosis. In addition, chemotherapy usage in patients with high-risk scores is associated with significantly longer overall and breast cancer-specific survival compared to high-risk patients who did not receive chemotherapy. On the contrary, patients with low-risk scores who were treated with chemotherapy tended to have shorter overall survival compared to low-risk patients who forwent chemotherapy.

conclusionWe have provided a comprehensive temporal overview of the use of Oncotype DX in breast cancer patients in the first decade after Oncotype DX was introduced. Our results suggest that the use of Oncotype DX is increasing in ER+ breast cancer and that the Oncotype DX test results provide valuable information for patient treatment and prognosis.

Indexed as

Reagent Kits, DiagnosticAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisReceptors, EstrogenRisk FactorsSEER ProgramSurvival AnalysisReagent Kits, DiagnosticReceptors, EstrogenAdjuvant chemotherapyBreast cancerOncotype DXPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID34274003
PMCPMC8285794
OpenAlexW3185767274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.